How to find the distance between these elements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter futurebird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the completeness of the l2 metric space, specifically how to compute the distance between sequences within this space. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the application of the l2 norm to sequences and the implications of Cauchy sequences in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods for calculating the l2 norm between sequences, debating the correct approach to find ||fn - fm||2. Questions arise about the interpretation of the norm and the relationship between the terms of the sequences.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct method for calculating the norm, while others express ongoing confusion about the underlying concepts. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations and attempts to clarify the relationships between the sequences.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a disconnect between this topic and other course material, indicating a struggle to see the broader implications of the proof being discussed. There are also mentions of potential errors in calculations related to the geometric series.

futurebird
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
I'm studying the proof that the l2 metric space is complete and I just don't get something about this proof.

What I know:

  1. l2 is the metric space whose elements are sequences that converge when you square each term and sum them. In other words, a sequence, f is in l2 if SUM( |f(k)|2) < infinity.
  2. The norm on this metric space is: (SUM( |f(k)|2))0.5 = || f ||2
  3. A sequence in the l2 space is a sequence of sequences (confusing isn't it?)
  4. To show that the space is complete I need to show that every cauchy sequence in l2 converges to a sequence in l2.
My book says:

Suppose that for e > o there exists n0 such that:

||fn - fm||2 < e when m, n >= n0.

I don't understand how to think about ||fn - fm||2.

Suppose fn = .1, .01, .001, ...
Suppose fm = .2, .02, .002, ...

How would I find ||fn - fm||2 computationally?

Do I do:

||fn - fm||2 = (|(.12 + .012, .0012 + ...) - (.22 + .022 + .0022 + ...)|)0.5
||fn - fm||2 = (|(.01 + .001, .0001 + ...) - (.04+ .004 + .0004 + ...)|)0.5
||fn - fm||2 = (|(.01 + .001, .0001 + ...) - (.04 + .004 + .0004 + ...)|)0.5
||fn - fm||2 = ( |1/90 - 4/90|)0.5
||fn - fm||2 = (3/90)0.5

or

[(.1 - .2)2 + (.01-.02)2, + ...]0.5 ?

I think it's the first way... but for some reason I'm confused. Deeply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the second way. First find the difference between the sequences, then calculate the norm. Your first calculation is | ||fn|| - ||fm|| |.
 
Thanks dick... OK... So...

|| fn - fm||2 = [(.1 - .2)^2 + (.01-.02)^2 + ...]^0.5
|| fn - fm||2 = [(.1)^2 + (.01)^2 + ...]^0.5
|| fn - fm||2 = [.01 + .001 + ...]^0.5
|| fn - fm||2 = [1/90]^0.5

1 / sqrt(90) is about 0.105409255Grrr... Ok so:

|fn(k) - fm(k)| <= || fn - fm||2

|fn(k) - fm(k)| is the absolute difference between the kth terms in fn and fm ... sequences that are "close enough together" so that || fn - fm||2 < e.

Suppose

fn = .1, .01, .001, ...
fm = .2, .02, .002, ...
are that close together. This is saying that

.1 < = || fn - fm||2

.1 < = 0.105409255

Yay! it worked! I don't know why but it did!

Thanks!

God... but why is |fn(k) - fm(k)| <= || fn - fm||2?

I'm not quite seeing that...
 
Last edited:
Oh wait I think I see that now... it's like:

x-y <= sqrt((x-y)^2 + positive stuff or zero)I wish I knew what this was all about... It seems very disconnected from the other things in the course... I just don't know where it's going ...
 
futurebird said:
Oh wait I think I see that now... it's like:

x-y <= sqrt((x-y)^2 + positive stuff or zero)


I wish I knew what this was all about... It seems very disconnected from the other things in the course... I just don't know where it's going ...

You mean |x-y|. Yes, that's what it's like. BTW I get 1/sqrt(99) for your first example for ||fn-fm||. The common ratio in the geometric series is wrong. It's 1/100, not 1/10.
 
Dick said:
You mean |x-y|. Yes, that's what it's like. BTW I get 1/sqrt(99) for your first example for ||fn-fm||. The common ratio in the geometric series is wrong. It's 1/100, not 1/10.

ah yes.. see that now. OK... this proof is starting to make a little more sense to me now. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K