How to find the equation for velocity of a mass on a spring?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using conservation of energy to derive the velocity equation for a mass on a spring at its equilibrium position. The key equation provided is v = A(k/m)^(0.5), with the initial and final energies set to zero at specific points in the mass's motion. Participants clarify the definitions of potential energy, emphasizing that gravitational potential energy can be set to zero at the equilibrium position, while the spring's stretch must be considered. The relationship between the amplitude, gravitational potential energy, and spring stretch is explored, leading to a clearer understanding of how to calculate the velocity. Ultimately, the participants reach a consensus on the correct approach to defining the energy terms in the problem.
Danya314
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The problem is to use conservation of energy to determine the equation for the velocity at the equilibrium position of an oscillating mass on a vertical spring. The question says to use three types of energy. The question gives the equation, the problem is to solve for it. The equation is v=A(k/m)^.5

Homework Equations


Uelastic+Ugravitational+Ukinetic=Uelastic+Ugravitational+Ukinetic

The Attempt at a Solution


The initial position I chose was at the bottom of the mass's motion and the final at equilibrium, so inital kinetic and final elastic and gravitational are zero.

mgh+.5kx^2=.5mv^2
since h and x are the amplitude,
mgA+.5kA^2=.5v^2
simplifying gives,
2gA+(k/m)A^2=v^2
How do I get rid of the gravity term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danya314 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The initial position I chose was at the bottom of the mass's motion and the final at equilibrium, so inital kinetic and final elastic and gravitational are zero.

mgh+.5kx^2=.5mv^2
since h and x are the amplitude,
mgA+.5kA^2=.5v^2

If you are taking gravitational PE to be zero at the equilibrium position, then what should be the sign of the gravitational PE at the bottom of the motion?

x represents the amount that the spring is stretched from the unstretched length. If the mass hangs at rest at the equilibrium position, then the spring is stretched. So, x is not equal to zero at the equilibrium position. Also, x is not equal to A at the bottom of the motion.
 
  • Like
Likes Danya314
Thanks for the help. But why wouldn't x be amplitude at the bottom?
 
The spring already has some stretch at the equilibrium position. Let this stretch be xe.

Then, at the bottom the spring will be stretched by x = xe + A.
 
  • Like
Likes Danya314
Would gravitational potential energy still be zero if I define xe to be 0?
 
Danya314 said:
Would gravitational potential energy still be zero if I define xe to be 0?

That depends. Are you redefining the axis so that Xe is the new zero?
 
The formula PE = 1/2 k x2 for the spring assumes that x is the amount of stretch of the spring. Since the spring is stretched at the equilibrium position, you cannot let xe = 0. You should be able to determine xe in terms of m, g, and k. (Think about the mass hanging at rest at the equilibrium position.)

For the gravitational PE you can use PE = mgy and you can choose y = 0 anywhere you want. So, you can choose y = 0 at the equilibrium position if you want. Then PE for gravity = 0 at the equilibrium position.
 
  • Like
Likes Danya314 and AlephNumbers
I have it now. Thank you very much.
 
Back
Top