How to Find the Phase Difference in Degrees

AI Thread Summary
To find the phase difference in degrees between two sine waves, first determine the period of the wave using the frequency; for a frequency of 10.4 kHz, the period is approximately 96.15 micro-seconds. The phase offset measured is 22 micro-seconds. To calculate the phase difference in degrees, divide the time offset by the period and multiply by 360 degrees, resulting in approximately 82.37 degrees. Alternatively, multiply the time offset by the frequency and then by 360 degrees per cycle for the same result. This method provides a clear understanding of how to convert time differences into angular measurements.
etotheo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Bit of a noob question,

I've measured the phase difference between sine waves of V(in) and V(out) using an oscilloscope to be 22.0 micro-seconds at a frequency of 10.4 kHz.

How would I find the phase difference in degrees?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found a good link:
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-timedelayphase.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The simplest way would be to measure the width of one cycle (if your scope gives you frequency, simply invert that) to give you the period. In your case, the frequency is given, so the period would be 1/10400 cycles per second = 96.15 micro-seconds per cycle.

On cycle equates to 360 degrees (that is, there are 360 degrees in one cycle). So, take your phase offset in time (22 micro-seconds), divide it by the period (96.15 micro-seconds per cycle) and multiply by 360 degrees per cycle. The result is the angular offset.

22 micro-seconds / 96.15 micro-seconds per cycle * 360 degrees/cycle = 82.37 degrees

Or, more simply, take the offset in time and multiply by the frequency. Then, multiply this result by 360 degrees per cycle.

22 micro-seconds * 10400 cycles per second * 360 degrees per cycle = 82.37 degrees
 
Just wanted to clean up my earlier post...

zgozvrm said:
The simplest way would be to measure the width of one cycle (if your scope gives you frequency, simply invert that) to give you the period. In your case, the frequency is given, so the period would be:

\frac{1}{10400}\enspace cycles\enspace per\enspace second = \frac{1\enspace cycle}{10400\enspace Sec}\approx\frac{96.15\mu{Sec}}{cycle}.

One cycle equates to 360^\circ (that is, there are 360^\circ in one cycle). So, take your phase offset in time (22 \mu{S}),

divide it by the period \left(\frac{96.15 \mu{S}}{cycle}\right) and multiply by \frac{360^\circ}{cycle}. The result is the angular offset.

22 \mu{S}\div \frac{96.15 \mu{S}}{cycle} \times \frac{360^\circ}{cycle} \approx 82.37^\circ

Or, more simply, take the offset in time and multiply by the frequency.

Then, multiply this result by \frac{360^\circ}{cycle}.

22 \mu{S} \times \frac{10400 \enspace cycles}{Sec} \times \frac{360^\circ}{cycle} \approx 82.37 ^\circ
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top