How to Find Vector Components and Parametric Equations for Plane Intersections?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving vector component problems and finding parametric equations for the intersection of two planes. The user correctly calculates the vector component of 2i + j - k in the direction of i - 3j + 2k using the projection formula, but there is a suggestion that they should also find the length of this vector. For the parametric equations of the intersection of the planes x - 2y + 3z = 5 and 3x + y - 2z = 1, the user employs Gaussian elimination and derives the equations x = 5 + (1/7)t, y = (11/7)t - 2, and z = t. It is recommended to verify these equations by substituting back into the original plane equations to ensure consistency. Overall, the user demonstrates a solid understanding of vector projections and parametric equations, with minor adjustments suggested for clarity.
dagg3r
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
hi all got some problems with vectors so waswondering if anyone can check what I've done
is correct thanks
question1.

find the vector component of 2i+j-k in the direction of i-3j+2k
basically i use the rule
a=(v*w^)*w^
w^= i-3j+2k / sqrt(14)

thus v=2i+j-k
therefore a=(2i+j-k)*( i-3j+2k / sqrt(14) ) * (i-3j+2k / sqrt(14))
a= [2(1)-3(1)-1(2) /sqrt(14)] * [i-3j+2k / sqrt(14)]
a= -3/sqrt(14)* i-3j+2k / sqrt(14)

thus the vector componentis a=-3/14( i-3j+2k) ?

2. find the parametric equationsof the straightline of intersection of the planes
x-2y+3z=5
3x+y-2z=1

i used gaussian elimination and got the tableu
1 -2 3 | 5
3 1 -2 | 1 R2-3R1

1 -2 3 | 5
0 7 -11| -14

x-2y+3z=5
7y-11z=-14
z=t

sub z=t into 7y-11z=-14
y=11t/7 - 2

sub y=11t/7 - 2 into x-2y+3z=5
x= 5 + 1/7t

therefore are the parametric equations
x= 5 + 1/7t
y=11t/7 - 2
z=t

??
thanks all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You found the projection vector along w, but it sounds like they just wanted the length of this vector. That is, just \vec v \cdot \hat w. Think of it like this: if you rearranged your axes so that w pointed along the new x axis, what would be the new x component of v?

2. The easiest way to check this is to plug x, y, and z back into the two plane equations and see if they solve them for all t (ie, t drops out and you get something like 1=1).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top