How to Find Vector Magnetic Potential A from Magnetic Flux Density B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jezse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the vector magnetic potential A from the magnetic flux density B of an infinitely long cylindrical conductor. The magnetic flux density is defined for both inside and outside the conductor, with specific formulas provided for each region. The relationship B = curl A is utilized to derive A, acknowledging the gauge invariance of the vector potential. Two solutions for A are presented: one for R<b and another for R>=b, each incorporating integration constants C1 and C2. The method confirms that the vector magnetic potential can be effectively calculated using the curl relationship.
jezse
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
magnetic flux density B for an infinitely long cylindrical conductor of radius b is know:

inside: B = (Mu*R*I)/(2*pi*b^2), R<b

outside: B = (Mu*I)/(2*pi*R^2), R>=b

I need to determine the vector magnetic potential A using only the relation B = curl A (del X A)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, the vector potential A is not unique, owing to gauge invariance of physical fields. Thus, you can use any gauge you wish, and an easy one to use is the one in which:

A=(1/2)Bxr

I got this from Goldstein, Classical Mechanics. I can't remember if I got the order of B and r correct, you should verify that curl[A] does indeed equal B.
 


Using the definition of curl, we can write:

curl A = (1/R)*(d/dR)(R*A)

Since we know B = curl A, we can substitute in the expressions for B inside and outside the conductor:

For R<b: (Mu*R*I)/(2*pi*b^2) = (1/R)*(d/dR)(R*A)
Solving for A, we get:

A = (Mu*I*R/2)*(ln(R/b))/(pi*b^2) + C1

For R>=b: (Mu*I)/(2*pi*R^2) = (1/R)*(d/dR)(R*A)
Solving for A, we get:

A = (Mu*I*R/2)*(1/R + C2)

Where C1 and C2 are integration constants. Therefore, we can determine the vector magnetic potential A for both inside and outside the conductor using only the given relationship B = curl A.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top