How to Find Velocity With Non-Constant Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
To find velocity with non-constant acceleration, integrate the acceleration function with respect to time. For the example given, where acceleration a(t) = 4.0t, the velocity at time t can be calculated using the definite integral from 0 to 3 seconds: v(3) = ∫_0^3 4t dt. This involves calculating the integral, which results in v(3) = 6.0 m/s after evaluating the limits. Understanding definite integrals is crucial for solving such problems involving time-dependent acceleration.
Ellipses
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I don't want someone to do the question so I won't include my actual homework question, but I would really appreciate if someone would tell me how to find velocity after a time t if your acceleration is non-constant and time dependent.

For example, if your acceleration was a = 4.0t and you want to find velocity after 3.0 seconds, how would you do that? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ellipses said:
Hi everyone. I don't want someone to do the question so I won't include my actual homework question, but I would really appreciate if someone would tell me how to find velocity after a time t if your acceleration is non-constant and time dependent.

For example, if your acceleration was a = 4.0t and you want to find velocity after 3.0 seconds, how would you do that? Thank you!

Have you learned calculus yet? You need to integrate the acceleration with respect to time, while setting the lower bound to 0 (seconds) and the upper bound to 3 (seconds), i.e.

v(3) = \int_0^3 a(t) dt = \int_0^3 4t dt

Here, v(t) refers to velocity as a function of time, so v(3) is velocity at time 3 seconds. a(t) is acceleration as a function of time.
 
Thanks for the answer! I know indefinite integrals but not definite so could you please explain how you solve your example? (:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top