How to formulate the Lagrangian for a cantileverbeam

  • Thread starter Jompa
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lagrangian
Your Name]In summary, the conversation discussed finding the expression for elastic potential energy in a beam subjected to a distributed load and two end moments. The "what" term in the equation represents the contribution of the distributed load to the elastic potential energy, and it should include the work done by the load on the beam. The equation for kinetic energy was also mentioned, but it was suggested to specify the units and limits of integration for better understanding.
  • #1
Jompa
1
0
Hello smarties!
Anyone who can help me out here?

The problem statement is in the attachment, problem.jpg

My attempt:
Lagrangian: L=T-U where T kin. energy and U elastic potential.

Stating T: T=[tex]\int[/tex]0.5*[tex]\rho[/tex]A(w(x,t)^2)dx from 0 to L

Stating U: U=L/6EI *[(-[tex]\int[/tex]q(x,t)xdx+M(t))^2 +M(t)(-[tex]\int[/tex]q(x,t)xdx+M(t)) +M(t)^2]- what?
(the integrals from 0 to L, sorry couldn't get the hang of how to get the limits to look nice with latex)

The get the expression for W (the expression before "what") comes from W=[tex]\overline{W}[/tex]=L/6EI*[M[tex]_{A}[/tex]M[tex]_{B}[/tex]+M[tex]_{A}[/tex]^2+M[tex]_{B}[/tex]^] where M[tex]_{A}[/tex] and M[tex]_{B}[/tex] are the moments at the ends of the beam. They are determined with help of moment equilibrium.

How should the "what" term look like? Should it look something like this [tex]^{}_{S_t}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]F*w(L,t)dS
Does my elastic energy come out right?

Thanks for helping!
Most grateful for all comments.
/J
 

Attachments

  • problem.JPG
    problem.JPG
    59.4 KB · Views: 387
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello J,

Thank you for reaching out for help with this problem. Based on the information you provided, it seems like you are trying to find the expression for the elastic potential energy in a beam subjected to a distributed load and two end moments. The "what" term in your equation should represent the contribution of the distributed load to the elastic potential energy. It should look something like this:

U = L/6EI * [(-∫q(x,t)xdx+M(t))^2 + M(t)(-∫q(x,t)xdx+M(t)) + M(t)^2 + ∫q(x,t)w(x,t)dx]

Where ∫q(x,t)w(x,t)dx represents the work done by the distributed load on the beam, and q(x,t) is the distributed load function. This term is necessary because the distributed load also contributes to the deformation of the beam, and therefore, to the elastic potential energy.

As for your expression for T (kinetic energy), it seems correct. However, it might be helpful to specify the units of the variables and constants in your equation, as well as the limits of integration. This will make it easier to understand and follow your calculations.

I hope this helps. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck with your research!
 

FAQ: How to formulate the Lagrangian for a cantileverbeam

What is a Lagrangian?

A Lagrangian is a mathematical function that describes the dynamics of a physical system. It is commonly used in classical mechanics to derive the equations of motion for a system.

Why is the Lagrangian used for formulating a cantilever beam?

The Lagrangian approach is useful for formulating the equations of motion for a cantilever beam because it takes into account the constraints and boundary conditions of the system, making it a more accurate and efficient method compared to other approaches.

What are the basic steps for formulating the Lagrangian for a cantilever beam?

The basic steps for formulating the Lagrangian for a cantilever beam are as follows:1. Identify all the forces acting on the beam.2. Define the kinetic and potential energy of the beam.3. Apply the principle of virtual work to derive the Lagrangian.4. Use the Euler-Lagrange equations to obtain the equations of motion.

Can the Lagrangian approach be used for any type of cantilever beam?

Yes, the Lagrangian approach can be used for any type of cantilever beam as long as the system can be described by a set of generalized coordinates and the principle of virtual work can be applied.

Are there any limitations to using the Lagrangian approach for a cantilever beam?

The Lagrangian approach may not be suitable for systems with highly nonlinear behavior or when the beam undergoes large deformations. In these cases, other methods such as finite element analysis may be more appropriate.

Back
Top