How to Integrate a Vector Equation in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Burnstryk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating a vector equation in the context of physics, specifically focusing on the scalar product of velocity and acceleration in relation to gravitational forces. The original poster expresses curiosity about the integration process for a given equation involving position vectors and gravitational constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differentiation of the scalar product of velocity, questioning how to integrate such expressions when the derivative is not immediately clear. There is a mention of a common integration technique involving the multiplication by the velocity vector.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting techniques for integration and questioning the assumptions in the original equation. There is an acknowledgment of the integration technique being relevant to the problem, although no consensus on a complete solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a note regarding a potential missing unit vector in the original equation, which may affect the interpretation of the gravitational law being discussed.

Burnstryk

Homework Statement


This is not a homework question, just a general wonderment , how can I integrate the following wrt time?

Homework Equations


\dot{\textbf{r}}.\ddot{\textbf{r}} +G(m_1 + m_2)\frac{\dot{\textbf{r}}}{r^2} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is given as \frac{1}{2}v^2 - \frac{G(m_1 + m_2)}{r} = C

This is to find the vis viva eqn, r represents position vectors

I know that for the second part of the eqn, I integrate dr/dt and get -1/r when considering the r^2, it's the first part I'm having trouble with (scalar product)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get if you differentiate ##\dot{\vec r}^2## with respect to time?
 
Orodruin said:
What do you get if you differentiate ##\dot{\vec r}^2## with respect to time?

2 * v * a which makes sense, but I was wondering in general if there was a way to integrate a scalar product such as the one shown if the derivative of the solution wasn't so obvious.
 
The scalar product is nothing but a sum of terms. You can integrate each term individually.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burnstryk
Burnstryk said:
2 * v * a which makes sense, but I was wondering in general if there was a way to integrate a scalar product such as the one shown if the derivative of the solution wasn't so obvious.

Maybe I know what your problem is. What you posted is already part of the solution - the "multiplcation by ##\dot{\textbf{r}}## trick" is a common integration technique for this type of problem. It is used, because it is known that it leads to an equation which can easily be integrated (because ##\dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \ddot{\textbf{r}} ## is the derivative of ##\frac{1}{2}v^2##). Therefore, the reasoning is not "I have a scalar product, let's see how to integrate it" but "I know that for this kind of problem, a scalar product with ##\dot{\textbf{r}}## will help me solving it".

In your case, you have (btw, if it is supposed to be Newton's law of gravity, then there is a unit vector missing in your equation)

$$\ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\frac{GM}{r^2}\hat{\textbf{r}}$$,

and multiplication gives you

$$\dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}$$

which can be easily integated with respect to time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burnstryk
Orodruin said:
The scalar product is nothing but a sum of terms. You can integrate each term individually.

bluenoise said:
Maybe I know what your problem is. What you posted is already part of the solution - the "multiplcation by ##\dot{\textbf{r}}## trick" is a common integration technique for this type of problem. It is used, because it is known that it leads to an equation which can easily be integrated (because ##\dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \ddot{\textbf{r}} ## is the derivative of ##\frac{1}{2}v^2##). Therefore, the reasoning is not "I have a scalar product, let's see how to integrate it" but "I know that for this kind of problem, a scalar product with ##\dot{\textbf{r}}## will help me solving it".

In your case, you have (btw, if it is supposed to be Newton's law of gravity, then there is a unit vector missing in your equation)

$$\ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\frac{GM}{r^2}\hat{\textbf{r}}$$,

and multiplication gives you

$$\dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \dot{\textbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\textbf{r}}$$

which can be easily integated with respect to time.

Thank you both, I understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K