How to integrate partial differential eqn

agalea91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



im not sure the elegant way to put it, i need to integrate this somehow (ie, throw over the dt and integrate each side) but that squared is really tripping me up. is there a trick i should be using?
-g(cos(x))=r(dx/dt)^2

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



my attempt was initially to integrate 1/(cos(x))^(1/2), that is not pretty

i heard classmates talking about multiplying though by (dx/dt), not sure if that applies

any help appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did this equation come from?
 
Im solving for the tension in a pendulum, right now I am equating the radial accel with the force of gravity to try and integrate to something with a theta-not (representing the max amplitude of the pendulum) and theta (t). Hope that makes some sense
 
Your equation looks wrong since it suggests the only force in the radial direction is gravity, but the tension also acts radially.

You'd be better off integrating Newton's second law to find ##\theta(t)##, and then use F=ma to solve for the tension.
 
You're right, the full radial equation as I have it is this,

T=mgcos(theta)+mL(dtheta/dt)^2

My hope was that in integrating the right half independently of the tension then I could make a substitution (from the result of that integration, into the full equation) that would allow me to have an answer with theta-not component(s)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top