I How to interpret the diffraction envelope

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Sellers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
Bill Sellers
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Explanations of 2-slit interference sometimes show the interference pattern compared to a 1-slit diffraction pattern, and state that the latter represents a limit or envelope for the former. Is it correct to interpret the patterns as representing (directly or indirectly) the number of photons being detected at locations on the screen? If so, then wouldn’t this imply that fewer photons are detected in the 2-slit setup vs. 1-slit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Sellers said:
If so, then wouldn’t this imply that fewer photons are detected in the 2-slit setup vs. 1-slit?
When you compare number of photons to the screen between a single slit and a double slit experiment, you need to specify what is the same and what is different. Of course the source intensity is the same but what about the slit width? If the same number of photons per unit time goes through the double slit arrangement as goes through the single slit, then you should collect the same number of photons at the screen.
 
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to my query. I'm trying to understand a graphic such as the one at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/dslit.html. I'm guessing that the single slit envelope shows the pattern you'd get if you closed one of the slits and doubled the width of the remaining one. If that guess is correct, then presumably the same number of photons per unit time should be going through. But the interference pattern doesn't seem to reflect that--it seems to be showing fewer photons.
 
Such graphs are usually normalized to the peak intensity, so the absolute values of the count rates are not comparable.

As a rule of thumb: If you have one slit of a certain width which is illuminated with a certain intensity and now change to a different setting with two slits close to each other, where each of the two slits gets the same intensity as the single slit and has the same size, you will have twice the field in the area of constructive interference (if it is located in the middle between the slits). Accordingly, the peak intensity will be 4 times as high as before. If you use 3 slits, it will be 9 times as high. If you use many slits...you have just built a diffraction grating.
 
4 times--thanks, that makes sense!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top