How to invert an integral equation

nista
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose we have a physical quantity f(r) depending on another quantity q(r). f(r) is known at all points.
If the following relationship holds:

Homework Equations


f(r)=\int_{\Omega}q(r-r')dr'
where \Omega is a bounded volume,
is there any possibility to invert somehow such relationship
in order to have informations on q(r)?
Something like (but not necessarily):
q(r)=Lf(r)
where L is a linear operator.

The Attempt at a Solution


It is a problem similar to that of the Poisson equation, but I should procede
in the opposite way, starting from the integral relationship to get the differential form.
I have already tried to do that but with no success.
This is a textbook like example but I have to say I have no idea whether a solution exists.
(I have not taken it from a book)
Thank you very much to all
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
not an answer but maybe an insight, not totally sure on the generalistion to multiple dimensions, as I have only really played with convolutions in 1D...

here's some stuff on convolutions if you haven't seen them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution

define an indicator function for \Omega:
s(r) = 1, \ r \ in \ \Omega, \ 0 \ otherwise

Now using the indicator function, you can change the integral to a convolution over all space
f(r)=s*q = \int s(r') q(r-r')dr'

Using the properties of convolution q*s = s*q
f(r)=q*s = \int q(r') s(r-r')dr'

so the integral is summing up q(r) over the volume Omega, shifted to center r
 
then, the convolution theorem says, if you take the Fourier transform a convolution, then:
F=\mathbb{F} \{ f(r) \} = \mathbb{F} \{ q*s (r) \} =\mathbb{F} \{ q(r) \} \mathbb{F} \{ s(r) \} = QS

then rearranging for q
q(r) = \mathbb{F}^{-1} \{ \frac{F}{S} \}
 
I do not see anything I could complain about this derivation.
I guessed you solved the problem.
What else to say ...
Many thanks lanedance!
Hope you have a nice day,
Cheers
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top