How to Make Direct Product of Representations for the Lorentz Group?

Marco_84
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Lorentz Representations

I am reading about the Lorentz group on Schweber.
My problem is the following:
I don't really understand how to make the direct product of Representations for this Group.
I know that we need only 2 mubers since the invarints of the gropu are 2.
I know the general reciepie for the SU(n) case is it the same?

Let me ask an example explicity: I've read that Weyl is (1/2,0) Repr and its conjugate is obviously (0,1/2) left handed and right handed; while Dirac is (1/2,1/2).
How can i show that (1/2,0)x(0,1/2)=(1/2,1/2).

The book doesn't go so deep. i think i have to read somewhere else.

thanks in advance
marco
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[Never mind I've figured out by myself, it wws just necessary how works complexification for sl(2,C)..

marco
 
Did you figure out how (1/2,0) \otimes (0,1/2) =(1/2,1/2) ?
 
bigubau said:
Did you figure out how (1/2,0) \otimes (0,1/2) =(1/2,1/2) ?

yeah it is something like this:
(j1,j1')x(j2,j2')=Sum all possible combination of( j,j'). where

j=j1+j2,j1+j2-1,...,|j1-j2|.
j'=j1'+j2',j1'+j2'-1,...,|j1'-j2'|.

because after complexification you have that so(1,3) is isomorphic to su(2)xsu(2)...

bye bye
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top