How to proceed with nortonization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem related to "nortonization." The user initially seeks clarification on the behavior of voltage (Vo) and the application of the IR term in loop equations. A participant suggests that Vo equals Vx, which simplifies the problem, and explains their method for determining voltage polarity in circuit analysis. The user later confirms they have solved the problem and shares links to their solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent voltage drop and rise conventions in circuit analysis.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
72
Hi, :smile:

Please have a see on the following link: http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3438/imgmw.jpg

You also see my question there. There would be potential drop for Vo. I have also read that when the loop is traversed in the direction of loop current, then the IR term is subtracted; if the loop is traversed in the direction opposite to the direction of current, then IR term is added. Please help me. Thanks

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PainterGuy,

When I solved your second circuit and put my values in your equation it was right. Have you noticed that Vo=Vx? this might help simplify your problem. As for the other part of your question I follow a simple convention. When the loop current enters one end of a resistor, that is the positive side. I mark it with polarity + - from the ingoing end (+) to the out going end (-). Then as I write the loop equations I make any transition going from negative up to positive as a positive number and any path that goes from the positive terminal of the resistor (or source) to the negative terminal as a negative number. For example in your second equation you put

-Vo -2(I2 - I1)=0

I wrote

-Vo +Vx=0 then substitute Vx = 2(I1-I2)

These are the same thing since you reversed the order of I1 and I2 as you'd previously defined, but this is somewhat confusing for me to do it that way. If you always call a voltage drop negative and a voltage rise as positive it may seem less confusing.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, omega minus.

Hi everyone,

I have solved the problem. You can have a look if you like:
Part 1: http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/6241/part1dp.jpg
Part 2: http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/6678/part2g.jpg

Regards
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top