How to Prove ∇^2 (1/r) = 0 in Cartesian Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnaphun
  • Start date Start date
johnaphun
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write down an expression for ∇^2 in Cartesian co-ordinates and, by expressing the displacement vector r in Cartesians show that:

∇^2 ⎛ 1/r ⎞ = 0 for r > 0.

Homework Equations



I can do the first part of the question and i know how to show that ∇^2 ⎛ 1/r ⎞ = 0 in spherical polars but i think I'm missing something here.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried differentiating the x component of 1/r twice w.r to x and likewise with the y and z components but I'm not getting zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi johnaphun! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
johnaphun said:
I tried differentiating the x component of 1/r twice w.r to x and likewise with the y and z components but I'm not getting zero.

it should add up to zero :confused:

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong :smile:
 
Thanks for the quick response and apologies for my slow one!

Don't worry i manage to solve it in the end, silly miscalculations on my part.

Thank you for the help anyway!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top