How to Prove [A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I'm having trouble figuring out the following commutator relation problem:

Suppose A and B commute with their commutator, i.e., [B,[A,B]]=[A,[A,B]]=0. Show that

[A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B]

I have

[A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A

and also

[A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A = ABB^{n-1} - BB^{n-1}A

I don't know where to go from here. I'm not positive the above relation is correct either.
 
  • Like
Likes Nnyambenike
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
I'm having trouble figuring out the following commutator relation problem:

Suppose A and B commute with their commutator, i.e., [B,[A,B]]=[A,[A,B]]=0. Show that

[A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B]

I have

[A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A

and also

[A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A = ABB^{n-1} - BB^{n-1}A

I don't know where to go from here. I'm not positive the above relation is correct either.

Do you know the relation

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B] C

?

It's easy to prove. Just expand out.

Now, use with C= B^{n-1}.
, that is use [A,B^n] = B[A,B^{n-1}] + [A,B] B^{n-1}.
Now, repeat this again on the first term using now C= B^{n-2}. You will get a recursion formula that will give you the proof easily.
 
Help! I need to do this same exact problem. But I just don't understand what to do so I was wondering if you wouldn't mind showing the steps that you explained to do in order to get the final solution. Thank you so much!
 
i also need to answer the same problem for my quantum physics course. thank you.
 
Here's another way:

AB^n = (AB)B^{n-1}
=(BA+[A,B])B^{n-1}
=BAB^{n-1} + [A,B]B^{n-1}

Can you understand each step?

Now repeat on the first term on the right. Keep going until you end up with B^n A plus some other stuff. According to the statement of the problem, the other stuff should end up being n[A,B]B^{n-1}. It's crucial that [A,B] commutes with B to get this final result.
 
wohow! thanks Avodynefor the reply. got mixed up. my work all ended as a never ending subtraction of powers ofB. thanks for the idea.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top