How to Prove Maximum Speed in Free Fall with Viscous Friction?

fuchini
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello, First post hear so bear with me.

I have a mass in free fall with a viscous friction which can be derived from the dissipative potential Kv2/2. I must find the Lagrangian and proove that the maximum speed is v=mg/K. I have the following Lagrangian:

L=T-V=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^{2}-mgy-\frac{1}{2}k\dot{y}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}(m-k)\dot{y}^{2}-mgy

When I do the Euler-Lagrange:

\ddot{y}=-mg/(m-k)

However, from this equation I can't proove that maximum velocity.

Any help will be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I you sure "dissipative potential" was used in the question? Did you use the Euler-Lagrange equation that is appropriate for dissipative systems?
 
Hello, the question does say "Dissipative Potential". From what I've seen in class, if the force can be derived from a potential, the normal Euler-Lagrange equations are still valid. Therefore I used the following:

\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}(m-k)\dot{y}^{2}-mgy

Euler-Lagrange:

\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{y}})=0

And I get:

-mg-\frac{d}{dt}((m-k)\dot{y})=-mg-(m-k)\ddot{y}=0

Finally:

\ddot{y}=\frac{-mg}{(m-k)}

I think my problem is with the dissipative potential. How do I deal with it?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top