How to Prove the Classical Angular Momentum Commutation Relation?

AI Thread Summary
To prove the classical angular momentum commutation relation, the expression {Li, Lj} = εijkLk can be derived using the Levi-Civita symbol and the definition of the Poisson bracket. It is important to express Li in terms of the generalized coordinates qi and momenta pi. The discussion highlights that using square brackets can lead to confusion in classical mechanics. A participant expresses a desire to extend the relation to a general vector Vi, questioning how to construct such a vector while maintaining the relation {Vi, Lj} = εijkVk. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in notation and the proper formulation of vectors in classical mechanics.
ssamsymn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[Li,Lj]=εijkLk

how can I prove this expression classically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classically, L is not an operator, so you cannot define a commutator.

You can show that {Li, Lj}=εijkLk. I don't know if that's what you meant by saying "Classically". If so, just write out Li in terms of qi and pi. If you write the correct expression for it using Levi-Civita symbol and apply definition of Poisson bracket, it should be a trivial matter.
 
Yes, exactly. Thank you very much. Using square brackets may be confusing in classical mechanics. I figured out to make this with levi civita symbol. But there is another problem I have now. if I replace the Li with some general vector Vi, it should still be hold

{Vi,Lj}=εijkVk

how should I constract a general V vector?
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Effects of External Torques on the Angular Momentum of Asymmetric Bodies
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Mechanics of an inertial balance
Replies
6
Views
1K
Spinning Bike Wheel Example, how is angular momentum conserved?
Replies
9
Views
5K
I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
967
I Does the classical theory of angular momentum explain this video of a unicycle robot?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Classical EM vs Orbital Angular Momentum
Replies
9
Views
1K
How Does Angular Momentum Apply to Earth and Spinning Bike Wheels?
Replies
36
Views
4K
I Total angular momentum of a translating and rotating pancake
Replies
9
Views
2K
I How Does the Book's Formula for Angular Momentum Differ from Mine?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top