How to Prove the Refractive Index Equation in a Michelson Interferometer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter t1mbro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interferometer
t1mbro
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've been doing some working with a michelson interferometer, specifically finding the refractive index of a glass block. I am given this eqn:


n = (2t-ML)(1-cos)/ (2t (1 - cos) - mL)

Where n is the refractive index of the glass
M is number of fringes passing
I have left the thetas out becuase they mess up how it looks but u can assume cos = cos theta1.
t is thickness of the glass
L is Lambda the wavelength of the light.

I am trying to prove this eqn.

Here is what I have.

I know that the optical path length is the distance the light travels in the glass * n.

Where B is the distance traveled in the glass B = t cos theta2

Theta1 is angle of incidence, theta 2 is angle of refraction.

From elsewhere L = 2d/M

In this case B will be my d as this is the distance that the beam travel in excess of its normal path.

Now I have tried just shoving everything in and hoping I can simplify it but to no avail. How should I be going about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
interferometer

hi

You know what, we have the same problem. I'm also trying to simplify it. I'm using a backward approach. But I still can't find it. But anyway, if I'm going to be able to derive it totally, I'll just send it to you.
 
Not entirely sure I follow (sketch would help), but where do you get L=2d/M? B=tcos(theta2), but if I understand your problem then this is the path within the glass, not the distance the beam travels in excess of it's "normal" path.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top