How to set up partial fractions using linear factors?

philadelphia
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to intergrate the following

(4x2+2x-1)/ (x3+x2)
How to set up problem using linear factors?

The Attempt at a Solution



Factoring the denominator I get:
x2(x+1)

By linear/quadratic factoring I get:
A/x + Bx+C/ x2 + d/(x+1)

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. All you need to do is to solve for the coefficients.

If you don't like to do that, you can use the following alternative method. We have:

R(x) =(4x^2+2x-1)/ (x^3+x^2) =

(4x^2+2x-1)/ [x^2(1+x)]

Near x = -1 this is:

R(x) = 1/(1+x) * {[4x^2 + 2 x - 1]/x^2 at x = -1} =

1/(1+x)

Now, a more accurate expansion of R(x) near x = 1 would be obtained by multiplying 1/(1+x) by the expansion of [4x^2 + 2 x - 1]/x^2 around the point x = 1, then you would get an expansion of the form:

1/(1+x) [1 + A (1+x) + B (1+x)^2 + ...] =

1/(1+x) + A + B(1+x)^2


But only the first term in ths expansion is singual, it diverges as you let x tend to 1.

If we now consider the expansion of R(x) near the other singular point, x = 0, and collect all the singular terms, we get:

(4x^2+2x-1)/ [x^2(1+x)] =

1/x^2 [4x^2 + 2x - 1] series expansion of 1/(1+x) =


1/x^2 [4 x^2 + 2 x - 1] [1-x + x^2 - ...]=

-1/x^2 + 3/x + nonsingular terms.

So, we have that near x = 1, the singular behaviour of R(x) is given by 1/(1+x) while near x = 0 it is given by -1/x^2 + 3/x. Then it follows that the function:

R(x) - [1/(1+x) - 1/x^2 + 3/x]

is a rational function that has no singularities because the only singular points of R(x) are at zero and at x = 1 but we have subtracted the singular terms of R around these points. It thus follws that:

R(x) - [1/(1+x) - 1/x^2 + 3/x]

is a polynomial. But since both R(x) and the subtracted terms tend to zero at infinity this polynomial must be identical to zero. Therefore we have:

R(x) - [1/(1+x) - 1/x^2 + 3/x] = 0 ---------->

R(x) = 1/(1+x) - 1/x^2 +3/x

And we didn't need to solve a single equation to get this result.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top