How to Solve a Homogeneous System with Norm Constraint?

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
how would you solve an homogeneous system of the form A\mathbf{x}=0, with the constrain <\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}>=1. The matrix A is symmetric, but I don't know if it matters.
There should be a method involving eigenvalues, but strangely enough, I can't find it in any book.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not just do the most straightforward thing? First solve Ax=0. Then among its solutions, solve <x,x>=0.
 
The problem is that Ax=0 has a trivial solution which is x=0, and I am not interested in that.
 
If x=0 is entire solution set to Ax=0, then what does that say about the solution set to your original problem?
 
actually I don't know if x=0 is the entire solution set for the system. Hopefully it is not. I am interested in figuring out whether there are other solutions or not. and eventually find them.
 
mnb96 said:
I am interested in figuring out whether there are other solutions or not. and eventually find them.
Then do that -- use your linear algebra to find all of them.

Then once you know all of them, you can find which of them satisfy your constraint.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top