How to Solve Acceleration vs Time Graph Problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an acceleration vs. time graph problem for an exam. The original poster is confused about how to calculate velocity without a given acceleration, noting that the graph may have an error regarding the y-axis values. Participants suggest that the graph's vertical scale likely corresponds to acceleration and emphasize that the area under the graph represents the change in velocity. They explain that for constant acceleration, the formula V = V(0) + at can be used, and the area of the graph can help determine the change in velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between acceleration, time, and velocity in physics problems.
ev_physics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm practicing for my exam and so I'm studying off practice tests that my professor gave me.
One of the problems is an acceleration vs time graph. The question is question #2 on the link below.

http://facultyfiles.deanza.edu/gems/lunaeduardo/Physics50Exam1W11.pdf



Homework Equations



I'm trying to use
Velocity = acceleration*time
but I'm not given an acceleration


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm assuming because at t = 0s, velocity = 10 m/s.
I understand that Acceleration is velocity (m/s) per 1 second but if velocity at 0s is 10m/s, how do you use that to calculate for a time at maybe, 1s or 2s?
Any help will be great.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi there, welcome to physicsforums :)

I've looked at the graph, and I think they made a mistake. The y-axis of the graph should have values for the acceleration. As it is now, I don't think you can calculate anything from it!
 
BruceW said:
hi there, welcome to physicsforums :)

I've looked at the graph, and I think they made a mistake. The y-axis of the graph should have values for the acceleration. As it is now, I don't think you can calculate anything from it!

Thank you!

Ya, I've been looking at the graph for a long time and trying to figure out why I can't get an answer. At first, I thought it was probably me just not understanding how a A vs. T graph works but after an hour of looking around and watching youtube videos and everything, I concluded that I don't think I can be that clueless...

However, I feel like the "t=0s, then velocity = 10m/s" is where you are supposed to start at maybe?
Its just hard to believe that my professor would give us an incorrect problem to study from for an exam :confused:
 
Maybe your professor meant that one scale on the vertical axis corresponded to 1 m/s2 acceleration. Try to solve it that way. And remember: acceleration is change of velocity over a time interval Δt: a=ΔV/Δt. In case of constant acceleration, V=V(0)+at, but the acceleration varies with time in the figure. In that case, the area under the a(t) diagram gives the change of velocity. For example, the acceleration-time graph encloses a triangle between 0 and 25 s. The height is 7 scales=7 m/s. The "area" of the triangle is [25(s) * 7 (m/s2)]/2= 87.5 m/s. It is the change of velocity between t=0 and t=25 s. To get the actual velocity, add 10 m/s.

ehild
 
possibly too much help there. But I do agree, the professor probably just forgot to mention what the scale on the vertical axis was meant to be, so you can still try the problem by taking a guess at what the scale is meant to be. (But if your professor has used a different scale, then your answer may not turn out the same as his, but it is good practice anyway).
 
Bruce, this is a very unusual problem for students unfamiliar with calculus and just studying motion with uniform acceleration. I do not think I gave too much help by explaining how to relate area under acceleration to change of velocity. ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top