How to solve cube roots question ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunny86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Roots
sunny86
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How to solve cube roots question ?
Example :
x^3 - 100x^2 - 7800x + 16300 = 0

I had think long time but still cannot find the way. Besides trial an error, is there anyway to solve this problem ?
thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are numerical methods to get approximate solutions ...

For an exact solution you may find useful this

http://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/JFM/Vol12/polyeq_1.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For a given equation x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0, we can substitute x=y-\frac{a}{3}, which implies y^3+py+q=0, where p=b-\frac{a^2}{3}, and q=\frac{2a^3}{17}-\frac{ab}{3}+c. After further manipulation, one can retrieve x=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}+\sqrt{(\frac{q}{2})^2+(\frac{p}{3})^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}-\sqrt{(\frac{q}{2})^2+(\frac{p}{3})^3}}, which represents Cardan's formula.
 
thank guy ~
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top