How to solve for final velocity of object pushed by spring using concept of engergy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the final velocity of an object pushed by a spring, highlighting a misunderstanding of the system's mechanics. The incorrect assumption is that the glider would continue at a steady velocity after the spring is uncompressed, ignoring the spring's role in pulling the glider back once it passes the unstretched position. The correct final velocities are 1.47 m/s for part (a) and 1.35 m/s for part (b), with the latter being lower due to the spring's pulling force. This illustrates the importance of accurately visualizing the system's dynamics, particularly how the spring interacts with the glider. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly applying energy principles in physics problems.
divgrad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here is the given problem:

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6781/problemtk6.jpg

Here is my incorrect solution:

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/6698/solutionzm3.jpg


Why should distance even matter for the final velocity in this problem since once the spring is uncompressed, the cart will continue at a steady velocity forever since there is no friction or air resistance?

The answer for (a) is 1.47 m/s, and the answer for (b) is 1.35 m/s. Again, why would the velocity be less for part (b) when there is no energy loss from either friction or air resistance?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the problem says that the glider is attatched to the spring.
 
I think you have an incorrect mental picture of the system. The glider is attached to a spring which, in turn, is fixed to some point on the track (or attached to a wall, for instance). So, once the glider passes the unstretched position, the spring starts pulling instead of pushing, thus slowing the glider.
 
Ok, I was thinking the spring (which is attached to the glider) was compressed then allowed to push off of a wall and push the glider and spring backwards.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top