How to solve for first integrals of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding first integrals of motion for a point particle in a potential field defined by U=-α/r. Participants emphasize the relationship between first integrals and conserved quantities, noting that first integrals are properties of motion that remain constant over time. The use of spherical coordinates is suggested to simplify the analysis due to the conservation of angular momentum in a central force field. Noether's theorem is highlighted as a key concept linking symmetries of the Lagrangian to conservation laws, indicating that the Lagrangian has multiple symmetries leading to various conserved quantities. Overall, a deeper understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and Noether's theorem is essential for solving the problem effectively.
mat
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point particle is moving in a field, where its potential energy is U=-α/r. Find first motion integrals.

Homework Equations


How to derive it

The Attempt at a Solution


I only figured out that all of this is related to the conservation of energy, but i don't know even the basic steps how to approach such problem..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to Physics Forums!

In order for us to help you properly, you will need to provide more information on what you have tried and what conclusions you have come to by applying what you have learned in class or in a textbook. For example, what are first integrals of motion? How do they relate to conserved quantities? What are the equations governing the behaviour of a particle in a potential? Do you know what Noether's theorem is?
 
Oh thanks for the reply. So i do have a vague understanding of what first integrals are and how they differ from constants of motion. First integral is some property of motion which does not change with respect to time, is symmetrical. So for the problem at hand we have motion in a central force field (potential energy depends only on position vector) and we can choose spherical coordinate system here to take advantage of the fact that the angular momentum does not change and we have motion in one plane. Now i read that since we have non changing angular momentum (dL/dt=0) we have three independant constants of motion (don't really know the reason why..) and we need to analyze those to get first integrals (i know that all first integrals are constants of motion, but not all constants of motion are first integrals). We construct lagrangian in polar coordinates L=T-V=1/2m((dr/dt)^2+(rdφ/dt)^2)-U(r) (still, don't actually know now what it is) and from this equation we can extract first integrals (?). I read about Noather's a little... As you can see, i have little understanding about this problem, but i must do it until 2015-02-25 and i am becoming desprate :D. Any clarification/solution/explanation is most welcome, we don't have worked examples on such problems and so it is immensly hard for me to just simply apply the theory.
 
Orodruin said:
Hi and welcome to Physics Forums!

In order for us to help you properly, you will need to provide more information on what you have tried and what conclusions you have come to by applying what you have learned in class or in a textbook. For example, what are first integrals of motion? How do they relate to conserved quantities? What are the equations governing the behaviour of a particle in a potential? Do you know what Noether's theorem is?

I posted what i know above. Can i solve this problem just with Noether's theorem? Thank you
 
Noether's theorem relates symmetries of the Lagrangian to conserved quantities. All of the conservation laws you are familiar with are in one way or another corresponding to such a symmetry. For example, energy conservation is a direct implication of time translation invariance of the Lagrangian. Your Lagrangian has more symmetries than that and therefore more conserved quantities.

When we talk about first integrals in physics, this is normally equivalent to talking about constants of motion.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top