Archived How to use series expansion to simplify

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using series expansion to simplify the analysis of a lightly damped harmonic oscillator driven at frequency ω. The user has identified two solutions for the driving frequency that yield a steady-state oscillation amplitude half that of resonance, specifically ω = ω0±√3γ. They also derived phase shifts between the driving force and displacement at these frequencies but are struggling to simplify their results using series expansion. The conversation highlights the importance of Taylor series expansions for approximating complex functions and suggests that a first-order approximation is needed for clarity. Overall, the thread emphasizes the application of series expansion techniques in solving oscillatory motion problems.
tadarah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new to this forum, so if there is anything wrong in this post please forgive me,

I'm not sure my post will be shown correctly, so I attached a doc file.

The question is

A lightly damped harmonic osillator, γ<<ω0, is driven at frequency ω.

1,
Find the frequency of the driving force such that the steady-state oscillation amplitude is one half of that at the resonance. How many solutions are there?

I found that two solutions, ω = ω0±√3γ (two solutions ± )

then

2,
Find the phase shifts between the driving force and the displacement at these frequencies to the first order in the ratio γ/ω0.
Give your answer as Φ= tan-1[a+bγ/ω0], where a, b are numbers; use series expansion for the messy analytic expressions

I got two solions,
I got
Φ1 = tan-1[2γ(ω0+√3γ) / ω02 – (ω0+√3γ)2]
and
Φ2 = tan-1[2γ(ω0-√3γ) / ω02 – (ω0-√3γ 2]

but I couldn't find the way to use series expansion to simplify my solutions,

Please someone help me!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what the messy function is, so I can't answer the question specifically. Do you know about Taylor series expansions? A first-order approximation would be the sum truncated at the term that's first order in the derivative and the displacement from the initial point. There is a TS expansion for multi-variable functions, and a corresponding expansion for complex-valued functions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top