How to use the gradient to find Electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a semi-circular rod with a uniform charge distribution. The electric potential at the center is expressed as V = kQ/r or k(pi)(lambda), where lambda represents charge density. The correct electric field expression is derived as 2k(lambda)/r, but there is confusion regarding the gradient of the electric potential, which yields an incorrect result of kQ/r^2. The issue arises from misunderstanding the gradient's application and the changing direction of the electric field at the center. To resolve this, one must consider the contributions from small elements along the semi-circle and sum them appropriately.
howell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. A rod carrying a uniform charge distribution is bent into a semi circle with the center on the orgin and a radius R. Calcualte the Electric field at the center of the semi circle using the electric potential expression found in part a



2. E = -(gradient)V



3. The electric potential at the center is V = kQ/r or k (pi) (lambda) where lambda is the charge density. The correct expression for the electric field at the center of the circle is 2k(lambda)/r. However, I'm finding that simply taking the gradient of the electric potential function gives kQ/r^2 or k(lambda)(pi)/r, which is not correct. I'm afraid I'm making a fundamental mistake with the definition of the gradient and how to account for the changing electric field direction at the center of the semi circle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here you have taken the gradient along the radius.
First you have to finds out delta Ex( due to a small element dl) = -dV/dx and dEy = - dv/dy where dx = dr*cos (theta) and dy = dr*sin(theta). Take summation over the whole semicircular rod to find the field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top