How Were the Atomic Weights Calculated in Question 50?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of atomic weights in question 50, specifically the values 4.00260 amu, 1.00867 amu, 2.01410 amu, and 3.01605 amu. Participants clarify that these values are derived from atomic mass units, with carbon-12 as a reference point. The calculations involve the fusion of isotopes, where the resulting atomic weight is not a simple linear function of nucleons. The conversation highlights that the numbers reflect the energy released during fusion, which is significant for fusion reactor applications. Understanding these atomic weights is crucial for accurate calculations in nuclear chemistry.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In question 50 in this link:

http://www.tarleton.edu/Faculty/alow/prob21.htm

I was wondering how the numbers 4.00260 amu + 1.00867 amu – 2.01410 amu – 3.01605 amu been obtained?

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you.

The first part of question 50 states 2H + 3H → 4He + 1n

So are they multiplying these numbers by a certain constant to arrive at the numbers of 4.00260 amu + 1.00867 amu – 2.01410 amu – 3.01605 amu

If so, what is this constant?

As the numbers do look just slightly more than the numbers which I have emboldened.
 
they're not a constant times anything, atomic weight is not a linear function of the number of nucleons

fuse two protons (1H) together, that's two lots of 1.00867 = 2.01734, you get a 2H (= 2.01410) and some energy left over, which is the energy of fusion that they're trying to make use of in fusion reactors
 
tiny-tim said:
you get a 2H

You may want to change it to something closer to reality :wink:
 
oops! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top