Hubble constant from Time delays

egsid
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone it seems to me that people understand how to do this problem but I am struggling to solve it.

Homework Statement


A quasar with redshift 0.3 is gravitationally lensed into two images by an elliptical galaxy at redshift 0.18. There are two images of the quasar which are separated from the center of the galaxy by 1.10 arcsecs and 1.60 arcsecs on opposite sides. One of the quasar images flares up in intensity by 1 mag. and 16.7 days later the second quasar image flares by the same amount and with the same time profile. Assume the quasar is directly behind the galaxy and that the light paths are straight lines from the quasar to the point nearest the galaxy, then bend, and then are again straight from the point nearest the galaxy to the Earth. From this information, calculate Hubble Constant.

Homework Equations



I think this is what is my problem.
I think maybe v = H0*d is the relevant equation. The angles given may help determine what d is which in some combination will help determine Hubble constant?

The Attempt at a Solution



So I drew my diagram and labeled it with the relevant details. I thought you had to calculate the velocity of the quasar and galaxy so I used the equation 1+z = sqrt((c+v)/(c-v)) to find them. Obviously the time delay is 16.7 days but I don't know how to use this to calculate the Hubble Constant. Also, I don't know if the fact that the intensity "flares up in intensity by 1 mag." is relevant.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've no background in relativity theory, so I may be off the mark here, but it looks like a simple geometry problem.
You have a straight line E (Earth), G (Galaxy), Q (Quasar). At right angles to this are the lines AG, GB to the points where the light paths are taken to bend. You know the ratio EG:GQ, and the angles GEA, GEB. That gives you the ratios of all the lengths in the diagram. The delay tells you the difference in length between the paths QAE, QBE, so that fixes all lengths absolutely.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top