Hubble lookback time based on energy density.

toughcanesrock
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the energy density of the vacuum were the value 10^133 eV/m^3 , what would the value of the Hubble lookback time be for such a universe with no curvature and no other matter?

Homework Equations


Possible equation...

...Lookback time = ln(1+z)/H

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure what to assume for z? And should I convert the energy density to kg/m^3. I am very confused, any direction for this question would be IMMENSELY appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tell us what you mean by Hubble lookback time.

Do you mean how far back in time a specific telescope e.g. the HST can see?
 
There is also a well-defined conventional quantity known as the Hubble time
it is not a "lookback" time and it is not associated with any particular telescope. It is just 1/H where H is the usual Hubble expansion rate "constant" (which is actually not constant over time)
The current value of the Hubble time is about 14.4 billion years.
Not to be confused with any "lookback" time.
 
Last edited:
R
marcus said:
There is also a well-defined conventional quantity known as the Hubble time
it is not a "lookback" time and it is not associated with any particular telescope. It is just 1/H where H is the usual Hubble expansion rate "constant" (which is actually not constant over time)
The current value of the Hubble time is about 14.4 billion years.
Not to be confused with any "lookback" time.

Right. So what my professor wants to know is what is the lookback time for a flat universe, with no matter, and a density of 10^133 eV/m . Would you know how to go about starting this? OmegaM would be 0 and OmegaK would be 0 right?
 
I'm not the right person to help you. In my universe "lookback" time doesn't mean anything unless you specify a telescope or an object you are looking at. If your professor were asking about the Hubble time then I would know how to proceed.

I would just multiply the energydensity by 8piG/3c^2 and that would give me H^2 and then the Hubble time is just 1/H and we're done.
It would be a simple application of the Friedmann equation and the Hubble time is constant in that situation.
 
marcus said:
I'm not the right person to help you. In my universe "lookback" time doesn't mean anything unless you specify a telescope or an object you are looking at. If your professor were asking about the Hubble time then I would know how to proceed.

I would just multiply the energydensity by 8piG/3c^2 and that would give me H^2 and then the Hubble time is just 1/H and we're done.
It would be a simple application of the Friedmann equation and the Hubble time is constant in that situation.
I think I will just do that, as that is what some of my peers are doing. Thanks so much for the assistance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top