Human Eye Optics: Near-Sightedness, Tree Image Distance & Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter runfast220
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Human Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to optics for a nearsighted person using contact lenses. The far point is established at 6.0 m, and the tree is located 18.0 m away with a height of 2.0 m. The participants clarify that the contacts act as a diverging lens, which means the image distance must be treated as negative. The calculations initially presented are corrected to reflect that the image formed by the contacts is virtual and located at -9.0 m, leading to a height of -1.0 m for the image. The conversation emphasizes understanding the lens type and proper application of optical equations.
runfast220
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The far point of a nearsighted person is 6.0 m from her eyes, and she wears contacts that enable her to see distant objects clearly. A tree is 18.0 m away and 2.0 m high. (a) when she looks through the contacts at the tree, what is its image distance? (b) How high is the image formed by the contacts?

Homework Equations



m= hi/ho=-di/do
1/do + 1/di = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to start the problem. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi runfast220! :wink:
runfast220 said:
The far point of a nearsighted person is 6.0 m from her eyes, and she wears contacts that enable her to see distant objects clearly. A tree is 18.0 m away and 2.0 m high. (a) when she looks through the contacts at the tree, what is its image distance? (b) How high is the image formed by the contacts?

The contact is a lens that makes an object at ∞ have an image at 6.0 m.

So calculate its f, and then apply that to an object at 18.0 m. :smile:
 
ok so...

1/f = 1/infin + 1/6
so f=6.0

1/di = 1/6 - 1/18 = .11
di = 9.0 m

hi/ho = - di/do
hi/2 = -9/18

hi = -1.0 m

does that look right?
 
Hi runfast220! :smile:
runfast220 said:
… does that look right?

Nooo :redface: … you've got the tree focussing at 9.0 m, which is too far away for the nearsighted person to see it!

Hint: is the contact a converging or a diverging lens? :wink:
 
Its a converging lens so does that make the di a virtual image thus making it -9.0m?
 
No, it's a diverging lens …

a converging lens wold make parallel lines (from ∞) come closer, but these contacts make them diverge, so that they appear to come from 6.0 m in front of the person.

And (from the PF Library on lens …)
f is positive for converging (eg. biconvex and plano-convex) lenses, and negative for diverging (eg. biconcave and plano-concave) lenses.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top