Human population verses time, fourier transform of that function .

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Human population verses time, Fourier transform of that "function".

Let the human population of the Earth be plotted verses time.

Assume that this function is almost continuous. What would a Fourier Time Transform of that function look like?

Is there a "strong" exponential component of such a transform?

Does the fact that the above function is acually a step function of time make the problem interesting?

Thank you for your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Spinnor said:
Let the human population of the Earth be plotted verses time.

Assume that this function is almost continuous. What would a Fourier Time Transform of that function look like?

Is there a "strong" exponential component of such a transform?

Does the fact that the above function is acually a step function of time make the problem interesting?

Thank you for your help.

What is the context of the question? Is it school work?

And why do you want to take a Fourier transform of a monotonically increasing, bounded function?
 


berkeman said:
What is the context of the question? Is it school work?

And why do you want to take a Fourier transform of a monotonically increasing, bounded function?

Son's homework in a fashion. I was tired and drew a blank. The question was is human population growth exponential. For small time frames I'm guessing that a exponential function can closely approximate human population for some time periods, but in reality the function it is the sum of many "basic" functions of time? Thank you.
 


I googled human population versus time, and got lots of useful hits. Here's one:

http://desip.igc.org/populationmaps.html

Do you have the raw numbers? It's kind of like the game of "Life", I would think. Where it there is infinite food and no predators or disease, then yes, population growth would be exponential. But as you say, there are other factors...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top