Huygens principle at the boundary of a volume

AI Thread Summary
To apply Huygens' principle at a volume boundary, precise knowledge of the material properties inside the volume is not necessary. The principle focuses on the fields at the boundary, allowing for an outward-looking approach. However, understanding the shape and position of the wavefront is essential before establishing secondary sources. This implies that one may need to wait until the beam exits the volume to gather necessary information. Overall, the boundary conditions are key to utilizing Huygens' principle effectively.
Ulises
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have the next dude:

To utilize the Huygens principle at the boundary of a volume, do we need to know precisely material properties inside the volume?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I understand, Huygen's principle is outward looking. So the benefit is that you don't need to know anything about inside the volume, just the fields at the boundary.
 
  • Like
Likes Ulises
RUber said:
As far as I understand, Huygen's principle is outward looking. So the benefit is that you don't need to know anything about inside the volume, just the fields at the boundary.
I think you first need to know the shape and position the wavefront before the secondary sources can be drawn. This probably means waiting until the beam emerges from the volume.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top