I Huygen's principle in practical sense

AI Thread Summary
Huygen's principle posits that every point on a wave front acts as a source of secondary wavelets, contributing to the forward propagation of the wave. The discussion raises two key questions: why waves do not travel backward and why the path of light is not illuminated despite every point being a source. The response clarifies that while every point can be considered a source for predicting wave behavior, this does not imply that waves propagate in reverse or that the entire path of light is visible. The principle is a theoretical model, not a literal description of light's behavior. Understanding these nuances is essential for grasping the practical implications of Huygen's principle.
americast
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I have two little clarifications to make about Huygen's principle: -
  • Why doesn't the wave go backward? I mean, if every point on the plane acts as the source of a secondary wavelet, then, along with the envelop which makes the wave travel apparently forward, another should make it travel backward.
  • If every point is a source, why doesn't the path of light get illuminated? That is, we know we can see only the source and destination of light, and not its path in between. So, if every point in its path is another source, the entire path should be visible.
Gramercy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
americast said:
Any ideas about the second point...?Gramercy...

Every point on the wave front may be regarded as new sources for the purpose of predicting the future location of the wave. It's not meant to be taken literally.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top