How Much Work Is Done Against Friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DKPeridot20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
AI Thread Summary
To determine the work done against friction on an inclined plane, first calculate the total work (Wtotal) using the kinetic energy formula, Wtotal = 1/2 mv^2. Next, find the gravitational work (Wgravity) using the formula mgh, where h is the height derived from the incline. The work done against friction (Wfriction) can then be calculated by rearranging the equation to Wfriction = Wtotal - Wgravity. The problem highlights the importance of understanding energy loss due to friction, which can be approached by comparing theoretical kinetic energy without friction to the actual kinetic energy observed. This method clarifies how energy is dissipated, emphasizing the role of friction in the system.
DKPeridot20
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I've been working on this particular question for some time and am sure that it's very simple but I continue to get the wrong answer...

An 18.0 N weight slides down a rough inclined plane which makes and angle of 29.0 degrees with the horizontal. The weight starts from rest and gains a speed of 15.0 m/s after sliding 150 m. How much work is done against friction?

I am under the impression that
1) I need to find Wtotal by saying it equals 1/2mv^2 (note: because the weight is 18.0 N I devided it by gravity=9.81m/s to get kg) (I've done it both ways though)
2) Find Wgravity by saying it equals mgh
3) Use Wtotal = Wgravity + Wfriction rearranged to say Wfriction = Wtotal - Wgravity
4) vwala - the wrong answer (I know this has to be something easy, I'm just not getting it. Friction and I are not friends...)

Choices are:
a. 1100 J
b. 1500 J
c. -1500 J
d. 229 J

How should I be going about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation with work there is a bit odd. Let's look at it another way.

Usually friction is pretty formidable for beginning students because it is hard to analyze its direction during complex motion. This question however, spares you from such pain. The way I would recommend to approach the problem is consider:

1. How fast would the mass be going without any friction? You know the inclination, you know the distance traveled, mgh = KE.

2. How fast is it actually going? 15m/s... this is lower than the value you calculated in part 1 isn't it?

3. Calculate the difference in your theoretical KE and the actual (given) KE.

4. So where did this kinetic energy go? Who stole it? Who's the culprit. I think you can handle from here ;)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top