Hydrogen bonds and binding energy question

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about binding energy in the context of a computational lab comparing solvation methods, there is confusion regarding the interpretation of positive and negative binding energy values. Some sources suggest that a more positive binding energy indicates stronger molecular interactions, while others claim that a more negative binding energy signifies stronger interactions. The correct interpretation hinges on the specific definition of binding energy used in the sources. The calculation method for binding energy involves taking the energy of acetic acid and water, then subtracting the energy of the hydrogen-bonded complex. A key point made is that greater energy required to break or alter a bond correlates with stronger interactions, emphasizing the importance of consistent definitions across different references.
ReidMerrill
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
I'm doing a computational lab about binding energy and comparing different methods of solvation. What does positive and negative binding energy signify? Half of the places I look say the more positive the binding energy the stronger the interaction between the molecules. Other places say the more negative the binding energy the stronger the interaction. Which is correct?
We're evaluation acetic acid and water hydrogen bonding. To get the binding energy were taking the energy of acetic acid + energy of water - energy of acetic acid and hydrogen bonded water
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Are you sure the sources use the same definition of binding energy?

The more energy you need to break or change a bond the stronger it is.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top