Hydrostatic Pressure on Curved Circular Surface

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of hydrostatic pressure on a curved circular surface, specifically in the context of a homework problem involving integration to find forces acting on a gate submerged in fluid. Participants explore the implications of pressure being isotropic and engage in a series of mathematical evaluations and conceptual clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their solution and seeks assistance, indicating confusion about the integration process.
  • Another participant explains that pressure at a given depth is isotropic and discusses the need to resolve forces into horizontal and vertical components for integration.
  • There is a suggestion to ask leading questions to guide the original poster towards the correct solution.
  • A participant proposes a formula for the horizontal force per unit width on the curved surface, which is acknowledged by others as correct.
  • Another participant presents a related problem involving a cylinder in equilibrium with different fluid densities and seeks to apply the integration approach discussed earlier.
  • Discrepancies in calculations are noted, with participants attempting to identify and correct errors in reasoning and mathematical steps.
  • Conceptual questions about the physical meaning of certain mathematical expressions are raised, indicating a desire for deeper understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the isotropic nature of pressure and the approach to resolving forces, but there are multiple competing views regarding the correct application of integration and the interpretation of results. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of final solutions and conceptual clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in their understanding and reasoning, particularly regarding the integration steps and the physical implications of certain calculations. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions that affect the conclusions drawn.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in hydrostatics, fluid mechanics, and the application of integration in solving physics problems related to pressure and forces in fluids.

Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Picture:[/B]
5f5nTA2.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
IuNr5xf.jpg


Can someone please help..There's no answers and I think my answer is very wrong, as you can see I have pretty much no idea what I'm doing.

Thanks

Edit:

Where it says net force I meant to say net force per unit width.

Edit2: My integration is wrong, it should read Density*gravitational constant*R^2(-1+cos(sin^-1(h/R)))
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Tom,

The pressure at a given depth is isotropic, meaning that it acts equally in all directions (i.e., perpendicular to any surface of arbitrary orientation). You correctly determined the force per unit width between Θ and Θ+dΘ as ##\rho g z Rd\theta##, where z is the local depth. This pressure force is acting perpendicular to the surface of the gate at depth z. So, you need to resolve this local force into components in the horizontal and vertical directions. You then integrate the horizontal and vertical components over the wetted surface of the gate.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Hi Tom,

The pressure at a given depth is isotropic, meaning that it acts equally in all directions (i.e., perpendicular to any surface of arbitrary orientation). You correctly determined the force per unit width between Θ and Θ+dΘ as ##\rho g z Rd\theta##, where z is the local depth. This pressure force is acting perpendicular to the surface of the gate at depth z. So, you need to resolve this local force into components in the horizontal and vertical directions. You then integrate the horizontal and vertical components over the wetted surface of the gate.

Chet
Hi Chet,

Thank you for replying, I appreciate it a lot. Does this solution look better to you? (the first F/width is in the x direction and the one after in the y direction).

bRIa9HD.jpg
 
Hi Tom,

This solution really isn't correct. But I think I can help you to arrive at the correct solution by asking you a sequence of leading questions.

At a given angle Θ, what is the depth of the location on the gate below the surface (in terms of R, h, and Θ)?

After you answer this, more questions to follow.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Hi Tom,

This solution really isn't correct. But I think I can help you to arrive at the correct solution by asking you a sequence of leading questions.

At a given angle Θ, what is the depth of the location on the gate below the surface (in terms of R, h, and Θ)?

After you answer this, more questions to follow.

Chet

Thanks for sticking with this, I thought h was the local depth (variable?), maybe I misunderstood the diagram. If we call h is a constant (representing the distance between the crest level and the surface of the water) then the local depth would just be z = h - Rsin \Theta
So the force per unit width acting perpendicular to the gate at d \Theta would be \rho gzRd \Theta = \rho gR(h-R \sin \Theta) d \Theta is that correct? If so, should I resolve that into it's horizontal and vertical components and then integrate from there?
 
Tom! You're the man! Excellent!

The answer to your question is yes.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Hardy
Chestermiller said:
Tom! You're the man! Excellent!

The answer to your question is yes.

Chet

Awesome, thanks so much for your help, I really appreciate it.
 
Hello Chet

Should the horizontal force per unit width on the curved surface be ##\frac{1}{2}ρgh^2## ?
 
Last edited:
Tanya Sharma said:
Hello Chet

Should the horizontal force per unit width on the curved surface be ##\frac{1}{2}ρgh^2## ?
Hi Tanya.

Yes. That's what Tom's integral comes out to be. And, of course, the answer could have been obtained much more easily in another way (which is the way, I'm sure, that you thought of). But I thought it would be useful for Tom to continue evaluating it by the integration. Would you like to reveal for Tom the much simpler way you figured it?

Chet
 
  • #10
Please have a look at the attached figure . The cylinder is lying on a frictionless surface with liquid of density 2ρ on left and liquid of density 3ρ on right . The cylinder is in equilibrium and our task is to find 'h' .

I am having problem applying this result to the situation in the figure.I know how to solve this problem wihout much maths,but would like to solve it with the above mentioned integration approach .

Let h = x +R

Using the result in post 8 , doing the horizontal force balance on the cylinder

## \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gx^2 + \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2 = \frac{1}{2}(3ρ)gR^2 ##

This gives , ## x = \frac{R}{\sqrt{2}} ## and ## h = R + \frac{R}{\sqrt{2}}## .

But value of h should come out to be ##\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}R## .

Could you help me in figuring out the mistake ?
 

Attachments

  • cylinder.PNG
    cylinder.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 559
  • #11
Tanya Sharma said:
Please have a look at the attached figure . The cylinder is lying on a frictionless surface with liquid of density 2ρ on left and liquid of density 3ρ on right . The cylinder is in equilibrium and our task is to find 'h' .

I am having problem applying this result to the situation in the figure.I know how to solve this problem wihout much maths,but would like to solve it with the above mentioned integration approach .

Let h = x +R

Using the result in post 8 , doing the horizontal force balance on the cylinder

## \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gx^2 + \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2 = \frac{1}{2}(3ρ)gR^2 ##

This gives , ## x = \frac{R}{\sqrt{2}} ## and ## h = R + \frac{R}{\sqrt{2}}## .

But value of h should come out to be ##\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}R## .

Could you help me in figuring out the mistake ?
Your error is on the left hand side of the equation. It should read: ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)g(R+x)^2=\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gh^2##

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
  • #12
I understand what you are saying , but I think i haven't explained myself properly .

I will go a bit slowly in order to find the mistake . Isn't the horizontal force exerted by fluid on the left side from bottom till height R = ## \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2 ## ?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Tanya Sharma said:
I understand what you are saying , but I think i haven't explained myself properly .

I will go a bit slowly in order to find the mistake . Isn't the horizontal force exerted by fluid on the left side from bottom till height R = ## \frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2 ## ?
No it isn't. What is the pressure at height R?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
  • #14
Thanks :smile: .

I have found the error in the maths involved in the problem . Now I would like to understand it a bit conceptually .

If the liquid on the left side were up to height R only , then the horizontal force would have been ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2## . Right ?

But this changes (i.e force due to liquid from bottom to height R ) from ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2## to ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)g(R^2+2xR)## , if the liquid on the left has height h = x +R , x ≥ 0 .

Could you explain this qualitatively.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Tanya Sharma said:
Thanks :smile: .

I have found the error in the maths involved in the problem . Now I would like to understand it a bit conceptually .

If the liquid on the left side were up to height R only , then the horizontal force would have been ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2## . Right ?

But this changes (i.e force due to liquid from bottom to height R ) from ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)gR^2## to ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)g(R^2+2xR)## , if the liquid on the left has height h = x +R , x ≥ 0 .

Could you explain this qualitatively.
So the real question is, "what does ##\frac{1}{2}(2ρ)g(2xR)## represent physically?"

What if we wrote this in a slightly different way: ##[(2ρ)gx]R##? What does ##[(2ρ)gx]## represent physically?

Chet
 
  • #16
No . This isn't what I intended to ask . Sorry for not being clear with my questions .

Nevertheless , I have found the error in my reasoning .

Thank you very much :oldsmile: . I am glad I discussed my doubts with you .
 

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K