B Hydrostatic pressure vs. gravity

AI Thread Summary
The bellows are lightweight, with a valve at the bottom weighing about a pound and a diameter of 2.5 inches. The top valve is positioned 12 inches from the surface, while the bottom valve starts at 20 inches and can extend to 32 inches. The bellows can move freely as they are attached to the valve, which is denser than water and sinks, allowing for air intake when the top valve is opened. Discussions highlight the balance between the buoyant force and the weight of the apparatus, suggesting that the buoyant force may exceed the valve's weight, influencing the bellows' behavior. The pressure dynamics inside the bellows, particularly when filled with water versus air, remain a point of inquiry.
CherryB
Gold Member
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
When I opened the atmospheric inlet the bellows extended only when there was water inside. I think that the weight of the water is causing that, but why?
Bellows Ex1.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How heavy are the bellows ?
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
The bellows are very light, but the valve on the bottom weighs about a pound
 
Also, the diameter of the bellows is 2.5"
 
What are the maximum and minimum depths from the surface to the bottom valve 2.
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
Is the valve attached to something that prevents it from moving relative to the water? If so, there would be a buoyant force that compresses the bellows when there is no water in the valve. This explanation assumes that the bellows is extended when it's out of the water.
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
Baluncore said:
What are the maximum and minimum depths from the surface to the bottom valve 2.
the top valve (Valve 1) is about 12 inches from the surface, while Valve 2 starts out 20" away and ends up 32" away, falling a total of 12"
 
kuruman said:
Is the valve attached to something that prevents it from moving relative to the water? If so, there would be a buoyant force that compresses the bellows when there is no water in the valve. This explanation assumes that the bellows is extended when it's out of the water.
The valve is attached to the bottom of the bellows and the bellows extend and contract, so the valve can move. There was water already inside the bellows, both valves were closed and the bellows were in their retracted position. The valve itself is denser than water, so it readily sinks, and when the top valve is opened to the atmosphere, the bellows descended and sucked air in as they fell. I did not think they would fall, and that's what is puzzling to me. I thought the water would push against the bottom of the bellows and would not allow them to fall
 
There's really not a lot to consider : displacement of the apparatus vs. weight of the apparatus, and any springiness the bellows have,
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
  • #10
hmmm27 said:
There's really not a lot to consider : displacement of the apparatus vs. weight of the apparatus, and any springiness the bellows have,
But isn't the water pressure from below stronger than the atmospheric pressure from above?
 
  • #11
hmmm27 said:
There's really not a lot to consider : displacement of the apparatus vs. weight of the apparatus, and any springiness the bellows have,
I agree. Suppose one fills the bellows with water while compressing them relative to their relaxed position and then closes the top valve. When released, the springiness of the bellows would cause them to extend a bit but that would create a partial vacuum inside which would prevent the bellows from extending fully. When the top valve is opened, the inside and outside pressure are equalized as air is sucked in.

@CherryB: Can you tell us under what conditions the top valve was closed?
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
  • #12
Sum forces on the bottom plane of the bellows (ignoring bellows weight):
-Weight of the valve (down)
-pressure difference (buoyant force - up)
-weight of any water inside bellows (down)
-force required to extend bellows (up)

The bellows will extend when the net force is 'down.' it will stop when the net force is '0'. It will retract when the net is 'up.' It sounds as if the buoyant force exceeds the weight of the valve for your apparatus - adding water (effectively) increases the weight of the valve.
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB and russ_watters
  • #13
What is the pressure in the chamber at the upper valve before it is opened (a) with no water present and (b) with water present.
 
  • Like
Likes CherryB
  • #14
I really appreciate all the feedback! I don't know the internal pressures, Chestermiller, as I did not have gauges in use. The bellows have a pretty strong spine that would keep them from being crushed by the hydrostatic force, but would allow them to be compressed through their length, so I would assume that the pressure inside would have to be pretty close, if not equal, to the pressure outside when full of water, but I am not sure about that pressure when full of air, because I was only allowing atmospheric air to sucked in vs pumped in.
 
  • #15
You reminded me about material density (displacement v weight). PVC is quite a bit denser than water, and it is the material of the lower valve, and the skin of the bellows, while the spine of the bellows are made of stainless steel, so that the bellows present just a little bit of resistance to being compressed.
 
  • #16
CherryB said:
I really appreciate all the feedback! I don't know the internal pressures, Chestermiller, as I did not have gauges in use. The bellows have a pretty strong spine that would keep them from being crushed by the hydrostatic force, but would allow them to be compressed through their length, so I would assume that the pressure inside would have to be pretty close, if not equal, to the pressure outside when full of water, but I am not sure about that pressure when full of air, because I was only allowing atmospheric air to sucked in vs pumped in.
Is it possible that there was partial vacuum in the heat space above the water in the bellows?
 
Back
Top