I am Imran, a retired Electrical Engineer with a QM question

Click For Summary
The discussion explains the derivation of the canonical commutation relation [x, p] = iħ using basic calculus and operator manipulation. By applying the position operator x and the momentum operator p to a wave function f(x) in different orders, the relationship is established. The momentum operator p is defined as -iħ d/dx, which can be understood through its action on plane waves, yielding a factor of momentum when applied. This relationship allows for the formulation of differential equations that connect variables such as wavenumber, frequency, and energy. Ultimately, this derivation is foundational for understanding quantum mechanics and leads to Schrödinger's equation.
ImranM098
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ,
Could somebody explain how to DERIVE the canonical postulate [Xcap,Pcap]=ihbar ? The idea of Pcap operator's origin as -ihbar d/dx also is found puzzling .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The canonical commutator ##[x, p] = i\hbar## can be derived with basic calculus (the product rule). We apply the operators x and p to a wave function f(x) in different orders and compare

$$px\,f(x) = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x f(x) = -i\hbar (1+ x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x) ) = (-i\hbar + xp)f(x)$$

Since f(x) is arbitrary, we have determined

$$px = -i\hbar + xp$$
$$[x,p] = xp - px = i\hbar$$

The origin of ##p= -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}## can be understood by considering its action on plane waves. If we have a plane wave ##e^{ikx}##, then applying the momentum operator ##p## extracts a factor of k (k is called a wavenumber which is spatial frequency)

$$-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}e^{ikx} = -i\cdot i \hbar k \cdot e^{ikx} = \hbar k\,e^{ikx}$$

So when you apply the momentum operator to a plane wave it returns the same function times a factor of momentum ##p=\hbar k##. So the momentum operator gives a factor of the momentum value when operating on a plane wave.
This enables you to write a differential equation that will satisfy a relationship between variables such as wavenumber k, frequency, or energy. For some differential equations you can cancel the function on both sides of the equation and be left with an algebraic equation in terms of variables like frequency and energy. This is basically how Schrodinger arrived at his famous equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, Mentz114, fresh_42 and 2 others
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...

Similar threads