I am Imran, a retired Electrical Engineer with a QM question

Click For Summary
The discussion explains the derivation of the canonical commutation relation [x, p] = iħ using basic calculus and operator manipulation. By applying the position operator x and the momentum operator p to a wave function f(x) in different orders, the relationship is established. The momentum operator p is defined as -iħ d/dx, which can be understood through its action on plane waves, yielding a factor of momentum when applied. This relationship allows for the formulation of differential equations that connect variables such as wavenumber, frequency, and energy. Ultimately, this derivation is foundational for understanding quantum mechanics and leads to Schrödinger's equation.
ImranM098
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ,
Could somebody explain how to DERIVE the canonical postulate [Xcap,Pcap]=ihbar ? The idea of Pcap operator's origin as -ihbar d/dx also is found puzzling .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The canonical commutator ##[x, p] = i\hbar## can be derived with basic calculus (the product rule). We apply the operators x and p to a wave function f(x) in different orders and compare

$$px\,f(x) = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x f(x) = -i\hbar (1+ x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x) ) = (-i\hbar + xp)f(x)$$

Since f(x) is arbitrary, we have determined

$$px = -i\hbar + xp$$
$$[x,p] = xp - px = i\hbar$$

The origin of ##p= -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}## can be understood by considering its action on plane waves. If we have a plane wave ##e^{ikx}##, then applying the momentum operator ##p## extracts a factor of k (k is called a wavenumber which is spatial frequency)

$$-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}e^{ikx} = -i\cdot i \hbar k \cdot e^{ikx} = \hbar k\,e^{ikx}$$

So when you apply the momentum operator to a plane wave it returns the same function times a factor of momentum ##p=\hbar k##. So the momentum operator gives a factor of the momentum value when operating on a plane wave.
This enables you to write a differential equation that will satisfy a relationship between variables such as wavenumber k, frequency, or energy. For some differential equations you can cancel the function on both sides of the equation and be left with an algebraic equation in terms of variables like frequency and energy. This is basically how Schrödinger arrived at his famous equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, Mentz114, fresh_42 and 2 others
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
732
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K