I don't understand why this is wrong (Work and kinetic energy problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block being lowered with a downward acceleration of g/2. The initial equation used to calculate the force exerted by the cord was incorrect due to a sign error regarding the direction of acceleration. The correct approach involves adjusting the equation to account for the upward force of the cord against the gravitational force. Consequently, the work done by the cord must consider the direction of both the force and the displacement. Clarifying these points is essential for accurately solving the problem.
frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Okay, here's the problem:

A cord is used to vertically lower an initially stationary block of mass M = 6.4 kg at a constant downward acceleration of g/2. When the block has fallen a distance d = 4.8 m, find (a) the work done by the cord's force on the block, (b) the work done by the gravitational force on the block, (c) the kinetic energy of the block, and (d) the speed of the block. (Note : Take the downward direction positive)

For a I come up with the equation:

F - Mg = Mg/2.

Solving for F I get:

F = 3Mg/2

Plugigng this into the basic equation for work I get:

W = 3Mgd/2

But when I plug in my values for M, g, and d, I get a wrong answer. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
frankfjf said:
Okay, here's the problem:

A cord is used to vertically lower an initially stationary block of mass M = 6.4 kg at a constant downward acceleration of g/2. When the block has fallen a distance d = 4.8 m, find (a) the work done by the cord's force on the block, (b) the work done by the gravitational force on the block, (c) the kinetic energy of the block, and (d) the speed of the block. (Note : Take the downward direction positive)

For a I come up with the equation:

F - Mg = Mg/2.

Solving for F I get:

F = 3Mg/2

Plugigng this into the basic equation for work I get:

W = 3Mgd/2

But when I plug in my values for M, g, and d, I get a wrong answer. Why?

If there is a *downward* acceleration of g/2, it means that a_y = - g/2. You used +g/2 in your equation.
 
But it says to take the downward direction to be positive.
 
frankfjf said:
But it says to take the downward direction to be positive.

All right. Then your equation should be -F + Mg = Mg/2
 
nrqed said:
All right. Then your equation should be -F + Mg = Mg/2

And then when you calculate the work done, F is upward and d is downward.

-Dan
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top