I have a question about Kinetic and Potential Energies.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy gain, potential energy loss, work done against friction, and average frictional resistance for a parcel sliding down a 12-meter chute. The parcel starts from rest at a height of 3 meters and reaches a speed of 5 meters per second at the bottom. Participants express confusion about the problem and seek assistance in solving it, particularly in understanding the equations for kinetic and potential energy. The problem is framed as an inclined plane scenario, emphasizing the need for clarity in the calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges faced in applying energy concepts to this physics problem.
Alhussaini
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question: The top of a chute whose length is 12 meters is 3 meters vertically above its lowest point. A parcel of mass 1.6 Kilogram slides from rest from the top of the chute and reaches the lowest point with a speed of 5 meters per second. Calculate, for the the parcel:

(A) The gain in Kinetic Energy.
(B) The loss in Potential energy.
(C) The Work done in overcoming the frictional resistance.
(D) The average value of this resistance (force of friction).

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


KE and PE equations obviously.

The Attempt at a Solution


No idea. please everyone have a go at this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Alhussaini

What are your ideas on this?
 
ap123 said:
Hello Alhussaini

What are your ideas on this?

sorry i have no idea how to solve this, as i literally can't understand the English in this one.
please have a go at it and see if you can solve it. Your help is much appreciated! seriously it is !
 
Last edited:
Treat the "chute" as an inclined plane which the parcel slides down.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top