I have that the sequence [itex]a_n=\{2-(-1)^n\}[/itex] not converges.

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
solakis
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I have that the sequence a_n=\{2-(-1)^n\} not converges. I must show this with the rigorous definition.

I think use \exists{\epsilon>0}\forall{N\in\mathbb{N}}\exists{n\geq N}:|a_n-\ell|\geq\epsilon

How i can continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try showing that it's not a cauchy sequence instead and then just say "therefore it is not convergent."
 
Last edited:


Alternatively, note that a_n= 1 for n even, a_n= 3 for n odd. For any l, there exist arbitarily large n such that |a_n- l|> 1, half the distance between 1 and 3.
 


HallsofIvy said:
Alternatively, note that a_n= 1 for n even, a_n= 3 for n odd. For any l, there exist arbitarily large n such that |a_n- l|> 1, half the distance between 1 and 3.

So which do you think should be the value of ε>ο ??
 


solakis said:
So which do you think should be the value of ε>ο ??

HallsofIvy just told you what epsilon to use, half the value of the difference of the two possible values any term of the sequence can have.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top