How to Simplify This Algebraic Expression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jahnabi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the algebraic expression (x^4 + x^2y^2 + y^4)/(x^2 - x^2y^2 + y^2). A participant confirms the correctness of the denominator, which leads to confusion among others about the simplification process. Some suggest trying division as a method to simplify the expression. Clarification and further elaboration on the steps involved in the simplification are requested. The conversation highlights the challenges faced when tackling complex algebraic expressions.
Jahnabi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey!

Can anybody help me with this?

I need to simply the following expression:

(x^4 + x^2y^2 + y^4)/(x^2 - x^2y^2 + y^2)

I'd be so thankful ..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jahnabi said:
Hey!

Can anybody help me with this?

I need to simply the following expression:

(x^4 + x^2y^2 + y^4)/(x^2 - x^2y^2 + y^2)

I'd be so thankful ..

are sure the expression in the denominator is x^2 - x^2y^2 + y^2 and not x^2 - xy + y^2
 
yeah ..

oh, yeah .. I'm very sure about that ..
 
GroebnerBasis

hope it helps
 

Attachments

I'm sorry, but that went right over me ..! I didn't understand it a little bit .. Could you kindly elaborate? I'd be so very thankful ..
 
Did you simply try dividing?
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A doubt about the multiplicity of polynomials in two variables
Replies
8
Views
2K
MHB [ASK] A Line Intercepting A Circle
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Analyzing y as a Function of x
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Can this particular method solve these quadratic equations?
Replies
11
Views
1K
MHB Solving Trig Identity: Sin[1/2 sin^−1 (x)] = 1/2 X (sqr(1+x) –sqr(1-x))
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Variant of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff Formula
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB How to Simplify Rational Expressions with Variables
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB 2.4.10 3 circles one intersection
Replies
8
Views
1K
B Have I proved some part of Fermat's last theorem?
Replies
15
Views
2K
MHB How to Determine the Reflection of a Parabola by a Given Line?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top