I think I'm making this problem way too complicated than it really is.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bearhug
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the mass of Earth's water, given that 71% of the surface is covered with an average depth of 2.1 miles. The initial calculation led to an incorrect mass of 1.22e15 kg, prompting the user to seek clarification on their methodology. Participants suggested reviewing unit conversions and arithmetic, ultimately confirming that the correct mass is approximately 1.2x10^21 kg. The user revised their calculations and verified their understanding of the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit conversion and arithmetic in scientific calculations.
bearhug
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Assuming that 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered with water at an average depth of 2.1 mi, estimate the mass of the water on the Earth in kilograms.

What I originally did for this problem was find the total surface area of the Earth to be 1.97e8 mi^2 and multiplied by 0.71 to get the water's surface area to be 1.40e8mi^2. Then I multiplied that to 2.1 mi to get volume and found mass using D= m/V and converting to kg. The answer I got was 1.22e15 kg and it's wrong. (This is done on a computer program). I'm not sure if my math is wrong or if I'm making it a lot more complicated than it really is.

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like the correct approach to me. What did you use to get the surface area of the earth? You are mixing units in your explanation of your work -- did you use the correct conversion factors? Maybe post a more complete listing of your work, and we can see if anything pops out at us.


EDIT -- not really "mixing" units...I misspoke. Maybe it's an error in the mass/Volume part?
 
You seem to have the correct approach, but perhaps you made an arithmetic or unit conversion error. I get this:

Surface area of Earth: 5.1 × 1014 m2
Volume of oceans: 1.2 × 1018 m3
Mass of oceans: 1.2 × 1021 kilograms

- Warren
 
Last edited:
After looking at all replies I checked my math again and got what chroot got, 1.2x10^21 kg thanks for the help, at least I know that I understand the problem. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top