I was just wondering if there is any formal proof that two

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyber_paradox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
Two perpendicular vectors do not affect each other, as their inner product equals zero, indicating no projection onto one another. This principle is evident in physics, such as how gravity influences only the vertical component of a projectile's motion, leaving the horizontal component unchanged. While the concept may seem trivial, it is rooted in the mathematical properties of orthogonal vectors. The discussion highlights the understanding that formal proof exists in the form of vector mathematics. Overall, the relationship between perpendicular vectors is well-established in both theory and application.
cyber_paradox
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i was just wondering if there is any formal proof that two perpendicular vectors don't affect each other
i mean i do know that and understand it physically
for example that gravity does not have any affect on the horizontal component of the velocity of a projectile
but is there some proof of this
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello cyber paradox, welcome to physics forums.

What do you think about it?
 


thanks
i think there must be some proof of it.
 


do you know any?
 


You basically said it yourself. Orthogonal vectors can't be projected onto each other, their inner product equals zero. I don't think this can be proven any further, it's quite trivial.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top