Idea of Rolling, Rotation, and Transition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of Newton's laws, particularly in the context of rolling bodies. It establishes that when a force is applied off-center, it generates both translational and rotational kinetic energy, despite the acceleration of the center of mass remaining consistent with Newton's second law (ΣF = ma). The key takeaway is that while the force's point of application does not affect the acceleration of the center of mass, it significantly impacts the work done and the distribution of kinetic energy between translational and rotational forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly Newton's second law (ΣF = ma).
  • Familiarity with concepts of translational and rotational kinetic energy.
  • Basic knowledge of torque and its effects on motion.
  • Ability to analyze forces acting on rigid bodies in motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rolling motion.
  • Explore the concept of work-energy principle in the context of rolling bodies.
  • Learn about the moment of inertia and its role in rotational dynamics.
  • Investigate practical applications of rolling motion in real-world scenarios, such as wheels and gears.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling motion and the application of Newton's laws in complex scenarios.

Biloon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm very confuse about the idea of applying Newton's law of forces and torques on rolling body. The book shows that you can separate the situation in rolling into pure transition and pure rotation. However, what I don't get is, for the calculation of Newton's 2nd law of forces on pure transition, they calculate all forces, not just the one through center of mass... If what I remembered, the forces that are not through center of mass should create both rotational and transitional kinetic energy, right? In case of rolling, the 2nd law simply applied as sigma F = ma, where F is applied anywhere on the body.

From that equation, I got myself into some contradiction. In case 1, If i have a Force F applied on the center of mass, then it accelerates with F = ma. In case 2, if the force is not directed on the center of mass, and if I follow the book, the book simply use Newton 2nd law of forces and torques... so my accelerations remain the same but with some extra torque. Therefore, for the same amount of force and over certain period of time, both cases will not have the same kinetic energy...

From what I believe, the force that is not on the center of mass will be distribute into rotational and transitional kinetic energy. However, the book simply applied full magnitude of forces not through center of mass for Newton 2nd law in rolling motion; that is really disturbing for me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't confuse the application of Newton's 2nd law (ΣF = ma) with the work done by the applied force. As far as Newton's 2nd law goes, the point of application of the force doesn't matter when calculating the acceleration of the center of mass. But it certainly does when calculating the work done by the force.

If you apply the force off-center (so it exerts a torque about the center of mass) then the point of application of the force will move through a greater distance, which requires more work done and thus ends up giving the object more overall kinetic energy. The translational KE of the center of mass doesn't change but the rotational KE does--the 'extra' work goes into rotational KE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K