Ideal Gas Law Chang ein VolumeProblem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure required to prevent the expansion of water when its temperature is increased from 20°C to 30°C. The user applies the volume expansion coefficient and isothermal compressibility to determine the change in volume and subsequently the pressure change. They derive the relationship between pressure change and temperature change using the definitions of the coefficients involved. The final formula presented is ΔP = (β/κ)ΔT, which connects the change in pressure to the temperature change while holding volume constant. Additionally, the user inquires about representing the "therefore" symbol in the forum's Tex function.
Elzair
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am having a little trouble on this problem:

For Water at 25^{\circ}C, (Volume Expansion Coefficient) \beta = 2.57 * 10^{-4}K^{-1} and (Isothermal Compressibility) \kappa = 4.52*10^{-10}Pa^{-1}. Suppose you increase the temperature of some water from 20^{\circ}C to 30^{\circ}C. How much Pressure must you apply to prevent it from expanding?

Can I treat this as an Isobaric expansion and an Isothermal compression?

I think I found the change in Volume like this: \frac{\Delta V}{V_{0}}=\beta\Delta T

How do I find the Pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, I suppose you wish to find ΔP/ΔT, holding V constant,

so, consider P as a function of T and V, we know the partial derivatives relating to V, but not T. So consider, V=const (we are holding V constant), or V(T,P)=const, then

dV=\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_P dT + \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P}\right)_T dP=0

so that:
\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V=-\frac{\left(\partial V / \partial T\right)_P}{\left(\partial V/\partial P\right)_T}

now, look at the definition of \beta and \kappa, what are they (hint: they are related to partial derivatives of V)?
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

Thanks, I think I got it. I will now post the answer here for others.

\frac{dV}{dT} = \frac{\beta}{\kappa}

therefore \Delta P = \frac{\beta}{\kappa}\Delta T

P.S. Does the Tex function on this forum feature a way to represent the therefore symbol (i.e. a triangle of three dots)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top