How Does Adiabatic Expansion Affect Ideal Gas Pressure?

AI Thread Summary
In an adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas, the pressure decreases as the volume increases. The relationship between pressure and volume is expressed by the equation P1V1^gamma = P2V2^gamma. For a 50% increase in volume, V2 is 1.5 times V1, leading to a pressure reduction factor of approximately 2, calculated as P2 = P1/(3/2)^gamma. The setup of the calculation uses the ratio of pressures (P1/P2) equal to the ratio of volumes (V2/V1) raised to the power of gamma, which is a standard approach in thermodynamics to relate changes in state variables. Understanding this relationship clarifies why the pressure decreases as the gas expands adiabatically.
trah22
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an ideal gas is allowed to expand adiabatically until its volume increases by 50%. By what factor is the pressured reduced?(gamma=5/3)


Homework Equations



P1V1^gamma=P2V2^gamma

The Attempt at a Solution



P1V1^gamma=P2V2^gamma

v2=v1+.5V1=3/2V1

(p1/P2)=(v2/v1)^gamma=(3/2v1/v1)^gamma=3/2^gamma

so P2=P1/(3/2)^gamma=0.51P1 sp P2=.5P1

so reduced by approximately factor of 2

This is actually the correct answer, but i don't understand the why the intial setup of the calculation, is P1/P2=(V2/V1)^gamma, the problem is looking for the reduction of the pressure, could someone explain why your suppose to set up calculation this way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
more specifically why do you put p1 over p2 (p1/p2) equal to v2 over v1 (v2/v1) in solving this problem?
 
trah22 said:
more specifically why do you put p1 over p2 (p1/p2) equal to v2 over v1 (v2/v1) in solving this problem?
?? It is just algebra:

P_1V_1^\gamma = K = P_2V_2^\gamma

\frac{P_1V_1^\gamma}{P_2} = V_2^\gamma

\frac{P_1}{P_2} = \frac{V_2^\gamma}{V_1^\gamma}= \left(\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right)^\gamma

AM
 
lol for some reason i thought something else was going on, thanks anyways:biggrin:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top