Identifying Basic Solutions Without OH: Examining Salts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jules18
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a salt forms a basic solution when dissolved in water without the presence of hydroxide ions (OH), one must consider the hydrolysis of its constituent ions. Salts that yield anions capable of accepting protons, such as carbonate ions from K2CO3, typically create basic solutions. In contrast, salts like NaCl, (NH4)2SO4, CuSO4, and NH4NO3 do not produce basic solutions due to their ions not exhibiting significant basic properties. The Brønsted-Lowry theory emphasizes the role of proton donors and acceptors in this context. Therefore, K2CO3 is the primary salt among the options that leads to a basic solution upon dissolution.
Jules18
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
How do you know when something forms a basic solution when dissolved in water if it doesn't have an OH?
This is the question I'm looking at:

Which of the following salts forms a basic solution when dissolved in water?

(A) NaCl
(B) (NH4)2SO4
(C) CuSO4
(D) K2CO3
(E) NH4NO3


Thanks ahead of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top