Identifying Cepheid Variables from Spectrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Galaxy111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers attribute the observed Doppler shifts of Cepheid variables to pulsation rather than orbital motion due to intrinsic properties shared by stars of the same luminosity, suggesting a consistent behavior across these stars. Additionally, models of stellar dynamics, particularly concerning temperature, density, and pressure effects on helium, support the pulsation theory and align with observed data. The discussion highlights the challenges in definitively identifying Cepheid variables from pure spectral shifts alone, as distinguishing between pulsation and other causes remains complex. Factors such as the absence of a companion spectrum and the varying rates of emitted wavelengths during pulsation cycles are considered. Ultimately, while there are compelling reasons to favor pulsation, the definitive identification from spectrum alone is still debated.
Galaxy111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Recently I came across an interesting question:

"...Why do astronomers attribute the observed Doppler shifts of a Cepheid variable as pulsation, rather than to some other causes, such as orbital motion? "

OK, I have my ideas about the problem as there is a correlation between e. g. the max. blueshift (spectrum),the max surface temp. (from the Wien-displacement law I guess) and the apparent magnitude (observation) of the star.
But still, is there a way to tell it is a cepheid from its pure spectrum without knowing more?

Greetings
Galaxy :smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Just a guess, but possibly.
1, No spectrum from companion
2, Speed, does the rate measured for the expanding atmosphere give a reasonable orbital radius.
3, Wavelength time dependance, in the expanding atmosphere different wavelenghts might be emitted at different parts of the cycle as different temperatures/pressures are seen, if it was orbital they would all be moving at the same rate.
 
Thanks for an answer mgb phys. Yes, in fact all of the three have well to be considered.

Cheers
Galaxy
 
Yes - thank you Chronos. I know these calculations. Only, it doesn't really explain the tricky question. Why can we tell from the pure Doppler-shift of the Cepheid spectrum that the envelope of the star is moving and the red/blue-shift doesn't have some other cause? Interesting though. I think mgb phys has given some good starting points here.

Galaxy
 
There are two IMO very good reasons to explain this as pulsation over the proposed alternatives of orbital motions:

(1) The fact that all stars of a given luminosity behave the same way suggests that the variability is an intrinsic property of the star. If it was orbital, why are the orbits identical?

(2) Models of stellar dynamics - particularly the effect of temperature, density and pressure on helium - give pulsation and match the observed data. Alternatives do not.
 
Good point Vanadium; especially your no. 1 seems to lead to this suggestion. My initial thinking was also stellar dynamics, as it will convince as well.
But still, from the pure pure spectrum shift it seems to be quite difficult, if anyhow possible, to tell its the moving envelope.
Thanks again to you all.

Galaxy
 
Back
Top