Identifying Particles by Mass: A High-Energy Physics Experiment

AI Thread Summary
In a high-energy physics experiment, a particle with a radius of 0.27 m in a magnetic field of 2.7*10^-2 T and a kinetic energy of 4.1*10^16 J was analyzed to identify its mass. The calculations involved using the kinetic energy formula and the relationship between radius, mass, velocity, charge, and magnetic field. A mistake was made in the math, emphasizing the importance of not skipping steps in calculations. Ultimately, the particle was identified as a proton, highlighting the need for thoroughness in problem-solving. This discussion serves as a reminder to always show all work to avoid errors.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
why u should not skip steps

In a high-energy physics experiment, a subnuclear particle moves in a circular arc of 0.27-m radius perpendicular to a magnetic field of 2.7*10^-2 T. The kinetic energy of the particle is determined to be 4.1*10^16 J. Identify the particle from its mass. The masses of the electron, pion, and proton are 9.1*10^-31 kg, 2.5*10^-28 kg, and 1.67*10^-27 kg, respectively. Assume that the particle is known to have a positive charge equal to the magnitude of the electron charge.

Okay, so I know r= 0.27, B= 2.7*10^-2, q= 1.6*10^-19 C, and KE= 4.1*10^-16 J. Now I need to find mass to id the particle.
KE = \frac{mv^2}{2}, so v = \sqrt{2m * (KE)}.
r = \frac{mv}{qB}, and then I subbed in the v from the kinetic energy equation.
r = \frac{m\sqrt{2m * (KE)}}{qB}
\frac{rqB}{\sqrt{2KE}} = m^{3/2}
m = 1.49*10^-9.

I really screwed this up didnt I? Was it a conceptual or a math error?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Crap.

So it was a dumb math error. Perfect example of why you shouldn't skip steps like I do.

KE = \frac{mv^2}{2} \rightarrow 2KE = mv^2 \rightarrow \frac{2KE}{m} = v^2 \rightarrow v = \sqrt{\frac{2KE}{m}}.

Remember guys, show all your work!
hehe,
Tchicken.
 
By the way, the particle is a proton.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top